Tackling Violent Crime Act

An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

This bill was last introduced in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session, which ended in September 2008.

Sponsor

Rob Nicholson  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code by
(a) creating two new firearm offences and providing escalating mandatory sentences of imprisonment for serious firearm offences;
(b) strengthening the bail provisions for those accused of serious offences involving firearms and other regulated weapons;
(c) providing for more effective sentencing and monitoring of dangerous and high-risk offenders;
(d) introducing a new regime for the detection and investigation of drug impaired driving and strengthening the penalties for impaired driving; and
(e) raising the age of consent for sexual activity from 14 to 16 years.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

Nov. 26, 2007 Passed That Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be concurred in at report stage.
Nov. 26, 2007 Failed That Bill C-2 be amended by deleting Clause 42.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:05 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

I have just said that the question and comment period is over. However, if I can find unanimous consent for this courtesy, I will agree. Is there unanimous consent?

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:05 p.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:05 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:05 p.m.
See context

Nepean—Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeParliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board

Mr. Speaker, I see that I have been given unanimous consent to say a few words. I would like to thank my colleagues in the other parties for vesting such faith in me to give me this final opportunity to issue a closing word on the member's earlier remarks.

The member says that it has been his effort and the effort of other opposition members to attempt to improve the government's efforts to tackle violent crime. Does he consider it an improvement when he and other members of the Liberal opposition voted to allow arsonists, car thieves and burglars to serve their sentences in the comfort of their own home? That is precisely what they did in amending our bill to ban house arrest. They changed the bill to permit arsonists, car thieves and burglars to serve their sentences in our communities.

They also voted against mandatory jail time for gun criminals. The Liberals, including their critic, voted against mandatory jail time for gun criminals. Has he now reversed his position? Does he now accept that those criminals should be in jail, not doing house arrest, eating popcorn in front of their television in their living rooms?

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:05 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

Not to abuse the time of the House, given the courtesy that the House has accorded for this procedure, I have allowed one minute for the question and one minute for the reply.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Bloc

Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am always delighted to debate with my young colleague.

When we examined Bill C-9 in committee, we learned that conditional sentencing was generally used by the courts only with extreme moderation, that is, in only 5% of cases. Could the courts have made some mistakes? Could there have been any cases in which the judges imposed a conditional sentence that was unwarranted? Perhaps. In such instances, the case is appealed. I do not believe this justifies the government's desire to take this power away from judges, who must always use discretion in these matters. I think all the opposition parties want to see conditional sentencing remain a tool available to the courts. That was the thrust of the amendments we put forward in committee.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Prince George—Peace River B.C.

Conservative

Jay Hill ConservativeSecretary of State and Chief Government Whip

Mr. Speaker, there have been consultations between all the parties and we certainly appreciate their efforts in moving this legislation forward. Therefore, I would like to move the following motion and I think you will find unanimous consent for it. I move:

That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practices of the House, Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be proceeded with as follows:

The bill be deemed read a second time, referred to a legislative committee;

the membership of this legislative committee be Dick Harris, Daryl Kramp, Daniel Petit, Gerald Keddy, Rob Moore, Marlene Jennings, Derek Lee, Brian Murphy, Larry Bagnell, Réal Ménard, Carole Freeman, Joe Comartin and that the Chairman be Rick Dykstra; and

proceedings in the committee on the Bill shall be concluded as follows: if not previously concluded by midnight on November 22, 2007, at midnight on November 22, 2007 any proceedings before the Legislative Committee shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the committee stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate, at the conclusion of the committee stage the Chairman shall be instructed to report the bill back to the House on November 23, 2007, and shall be authorized to table the report with the Clerk at any time, including when the House is not sitting, if the Bill is not reported back by midnight on November 23, 2007, the Bill shall be deemed to have been reported from the Committee without amendment.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

Does the minister have the unanimous consent of the House to move the motion?

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

The House has heard the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Tackling Violent Crime ActGovernment Orders

October 26th, 2007 / 1:10 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Royal Galipeau

Consequently, pursuant to order made earlier today, this bill is referred to a legislative committee.

(Motion agreed to and bill deemed read the second time and referred to a committee.)