Early Learning and Child Care Act

An Act to establish criteria and conditions in respect of funding for early learning and child care programs in order to ensure the quality, accessibility, universality and accountability of those programs, and to appoint a council to advise the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development on matters relating to early learning and child care

This bill was last introduced in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session, which ended in September 2008.

This bill was previously introduced in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session.

Sponsor

Denise Savoie  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Third reading (House), as of Nov. 21, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.

This enactment establishes criteria and conditions in respect of early learning and child care programs that must be observed before payments are made by the Government of Canada to a province, territory or aboriginal peoples' organization in support of such a program. It also provides for the appointment of a council to advise the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development on matters relating to early learning and child care.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

Nov. 21, 2007 Passed That Bill C-303, An Act to establish criteria and conditions in respect of funding for early learning and child care programs in order to ensure the quality, accessibility, universality and accountability of those programs, and to appoint a council to advise the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development on matters relating to early learning and child care, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
Nov. 22, 2006 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.

April 24th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Bloc

Yves Lessard Bloc Chambly—Borduas, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd also like to thank our witnesses for joining us this afternoon to present their views on Bill C-303.

Speaking more directly to Mr. Lévesque, Ms. Bélanger and Ms. Elson, I'd like to say that despite your status within a so-called bipolar system, I appreciate the fact that you have overcome this situation and emphasized the positive side of this for society. You have put your personal interests aside. I appreciate that very much, particularly as your experience with the existing system is well recognized today. That doesn't take away from the fact that you have rights and interests to defend.

As parliamentarians, we also must gather information from all interested parties. Recently, on April 20 in fact, we heard from the Canadian Federation of Independent Business which voiced an entirely different opinion. Yet, it also professes to speak on your behalf. Its findings were at the opposite end of the spectrum. It noted the following:

To ensure that new daycare spaces can always be created on the basis of demand, we urge you and your committee to reject this bill and ask that all jurisdictions work together to ensure [...]

Am I to understand then that the federation is not speaking for you and that you distance yourself from this position?

April 24th, 2007 / 4:45 p.m.
See context

Susan Elson Executive Director, Davar Child Care Society

Thank you very much.

Good afternoon. My name is Susan Elson, and I represent the Alberta Child Care Network Association. I am also the executive director of Davar Child Care Society here in Calgary.

I would like to thank the committee for providing the opportunity to share the views of the Alberta child care community.

The Alberta Child Care Network Association is an umbrella organization, which was formally established five years ago but has been active since 1986. The association represents a significant number of child care centres and family day-home agencies in organizations across Alberta. Our membership includes both non-profit community-operated child care as well as private owner-operated programs. Collectively the members of our organization provide quality child care service to thousands of Alberta's children and their families.

The Alberta Child Care Network Association mandate includes promoting quality child care on behalf of the children and families of Alberta, supporting early childhood educators through training and education, examining and evaluating government policy and initiatives as it pertains to child care, and promoting public awareness and education as it relates to child care. I would like to clarify that “child care” in Alberta, as I'm defining it today, includes licensed and monitored child care centres and approved family day-home agencies.

I would also like to acknowledge the support and progress that Alberta Children's Services and the Alberta provincial government have provided to the child care community in our province.

I am speaking today to let you know of the Alberta Child Care Network Association's strong support for Bill C-303. In Alberta, as in every other province in Canada, we have struggled for decades to meet the high demand from families for high-quality, affordable child care services. We have watched as federal investments meant for child care have come and gone, some of them helping to make improvements, supporting minor initiatives, and some being invested in one-off programs, which have not had a lasting impact in building an early-learning child care system.

In the federal 2007-08 budget this year, Alberta has seen a cut in federal transfers of $92 million, which was to be transferred to Alberta communities to help address the critical shortage of child care spaces, to address quality through the Alberta child care accreditation process, and to continue to improve the wages of early childhood educators. With no accountability mechanism, $117 million was reduced to a mere $25 million. This is why the Alberta Child Care Network Association supports Bill C-303, an act that would ensure that federal investments in child care are directed to further development of the early learning and child care system that Albertans, and indeed Canadians, need and want.

In Alberta we are struggling even more than other provinces with recruitment and retention of early childhood educators to care for children because of the horrendous labour force shortages in our province. Under-resourced child care centres continue to compete in a labour market that engages in bidding wars to pay much higher wages. Alberta's workforce is crippled by the lack of available child care spaces. Parents who wish to combine parenting and employment simply cannot find or afford the care they need to support them in their employment and/or training. The cost of living in Alberta is high. In most two-parent families, both parents must work just to afford a place to live. Child care is not a luxury for families; it is a necessity.

We have worked hard in Alberta to improve early learning and child care services. Our accreditation system has done much to improve the quality of early child care services in Alberta, but there is much more to be done. Alberta's children deserve better. They deserve the guarantee to quality that Bill C-303 will provide through the principles of quality, affordability, universality, and developmental programming.

In recognition of Alberta's significant aboriginal population, we would further urge you to dedicate federal funding to aboriginal governments to ensure that aboriginal families under federal jurisdiction receive comparable resources to build their own early learning and child care services.

While our membership includes both not-for-profit community-owned child care programs as well as private owner-operator programs, we recognize the need to build a public child care system much like our public education and public health care systems.

Child care simply cannot be left to the marketplace. We have seen how the market approach has failed not only families, but also the committed operators who provide the services. Bill C-303 recognizes owner-operators as an important, if not critical, part of the foundation on which the system should be built. All of us, community-based and private, share the deep desire to provide high-quality, affordable, accessible, early learning child care services to Alberta's families. It's something that can only be achieved with the legislative framework that protects and supports the building of a system. Existing owner-operators are faced with the same challenge and will benefit from increased protected resources that will allow them to enhance the quality of their programs, pay substantial wages, and perhaps eke out a living that is more than an act of goodwill.

While the Alberta child care community has worked hard to achieve progress in many areas, the fact remains that significant financial investments by both the federal and provincial governments are required to build the child care system that is so desperately needed, not only in Alberta, but in Canada. Governments have an obligation to ensure that these investments are protected and publicly accountable. Therefore, we call on the members of the committee and the government to pass Bill C-303 , the Early Learning and Child Care Act. I encourage you to support Bill C-303. It's the accountable thing to do.

Thank you so much for your time today.

April 24th, 2007 / 4:40 p.m.
See context

Sylvain Lévesque President, Quebec's Private Daycare Association

Good day everyone.

The Association des garderies privées du Québec is pleased to present its point of view to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in its consideration of Bill C-303, which passed first reading on May 17, 2006.

Bill C-303 is another step forward in the planned improvement of services to families in Canada. It is important for the 500 or so childcare centres in Quebec and for the association that represents them to provide information to the committee based on their invaluable contribution to the educational childcare service system that has gradually been established since 1997.

April 24th, 2007 / 4:30 p.m.
See context

Executive Director, Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada

Monica Lysack

Absolutely.

First of all, it's important to note that there is a tremendous amount of inequity in the patchwork we have out there. We don't have a system; we do have a patchwork. Another committee, the HUMA committee, is meeting right now and considering child care legislation, Bill C-303, that will provide a legislative framework to guarantee standards around investments, so that the progress made through the bilateral agreements would not be lost and a new government couldn't simply come in and stop that progress.

You raised the question about whether the current investment is contributing to the patchwork. Even though there's an investment, $950 million was basically taken away, leaving $250 million, so it's not like a new investment, but a cut. Then that $250 million, because it's not part of a framework or there's no accountability for it, gets thrown into these one-off initiatives that don't actually deliver results. Some of the tools we've been working on at the CCAAC are policy tools that help us measure what happens if a province invests money in subsidies and whether that actually addresses affordability. In fact, we're finding it doesn't, necessarily, because fees will go up. So it's really important not only to have good solid investments, but to have those investments within a framework guided by the QUAD principles or something similar.

April 24th, 2007 / 3:35 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

Pursuant to the order of reference of Wednesday, November 22, the committee will now commence its study of Bill C-303.

I want to ask the committee, if they would indulge me, just quickly to have a look at the sixth report of the subcommittee on agenda and procedure, which is in your package. Let's have a quick look at it, and if there are no issues with it, perhaps we could quickly adopt it. If there is going to be a lot of major discussion, then by all means we will have to deal with it after.

These are the recommendations for what we're doing. It's the updated calendar for what we're going to be looking at over the next few weeks and going into June.

If everyone has had a chance to look at it and no one has any concerns, then I would ask whether we're able to adopt it at this time.

Mr. Savage, go ahead.

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

Right now we have four meetings scheduled on Bill C-303.

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

Lynne Yelich Conservative Blackstrap, SK

Would it make any sense to flip Bill C-284 and Bill C-303 and do Bill C-284 first?

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

Those are the two motions I wanted to deal with.

To deal with Mr. Savage and Ms. Yelich, would we like to add another day to Bill C-303? Is that what you're suggesting?

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

Right now we've allocated what was recommended, which was two days. We can certainly add to it in June, as Ms. Yelich was suggesting for Bill C-303. That's not a problem.

We have a motion on the table to extend the sitting days. If I have no further discussion on it, I'll call the vote.

(Motion agreed to)

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

I have it in front of me. The way the schedule works right now is that when we're done with them next week, we're going to start with Bill C-303, then the employability study, and then Bill C-284. That is the way it's going to work, as we decided on the subagenda.

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Liberal

Michael Savage Liberal Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

Mr. Chair, just for clarification, Bill C-284, then, will come when we're finished Bill C-303?

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

We're going to finish up the employability study and we're going to do Bill C-303 and Bill C-284. That is correct. That is the order we're going to follow.

The other thing I want to suggest, not to cloud the issues here, is about the motion of Ms. Redman that came forward. Mr. Lessard proposed, because of the way the motion was written, that we deal with it in May, which we do not have in our calendar right now.

I would encourage you all to go back to your whips to deal with the fact that Mr. Lessard has made a motion that makes a lot of sense: that we have a chance to look at it in the fall, because we are jammed up.

We also have the fact that we don't want to be sitting any more than two days a week. I know that will be coming up for a vote tomorrow night.

So I would encourage you to talk to the whips. It's not that we're trying to put if off, but we have a calendar that is full right now, and unless you want to start sitting three days a week again, that is an issue.

That was a very good motion, Mr. Lessard, that you put forward.

April 17th, 2007 / 5:15 p.m.
See context

Liberal

Michael Savage Liberal Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

Thank you, Chair.

Just on this bill, I understand the importance. Bill C-303 is a very important bill and requires sufficient time. Bill C-284 is also very important. I met today with some students, and they asked me the status of it, so I'm glad this came up today.

Will it be the next study we do after Bill C-303?

April 17th, 2007 / 5:10 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

No, trust me.

There's another issue coming up that we need to deal with as well, with regard to Karen Redman's motion, which I want to just touch on before we finish.

The motion we have before us, Mr. Martin, is that pursuant to Standing Order 97.1, the committee requests from the House an extension of 30 sitting days to complete the study of Bill C-303.

If there's no further discussion, I'll call the question.

(Motion agreed to)

There's one last motion that we need to move.

Ms. Dhalla.

April 17th, 2007 / 5:10 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dean Allison

That's not a bad.... I know there are witnesses on both sides who would like to come, and we're limiting it to four days. Why don't we deal with the issue, first of all, of the sitting days, which we need to extend for Bill C-303 and as well for Bill C-284? Why don't we deal with that issue first? Then we can entertain adding on another day or so to this.