First Nations Elections Act

An Act respecting the election and term of office of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations and the composition of council of those First Nations

This bill was last introduced in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session, which ended in September 2013.

Status

In committee (House), as of June 17, 2013
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.

This enactment establishes a regime, alternative to the one under the Indian Act, to govern the election of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations. Among other things, the regime
(a) provides that chiefs and councillors hold office for four years;
(b) provides that the election of a chief or councillor may be contested before a competent court; and
(c) sets out offences and penalties in relation to the election of a chief or councillor.
This enactment also allows First Nations to withdraw from the regime by adopting a written code that sets out the rules regarding the election of the members of their council.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

June 11, 2013 Passed That, in relation to Bill S-6, An Act respecting the election and term of office of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations and the composition of council of those First Nations, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the second reading stage of the Bill; and that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the second reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

Conservative

Bernard Valcourt Conservative Madawaska—Restigouche, NB

Mr. Speaker, I am laughing because the member brought up parliamentary procedure. I was thinking about the period from 1984 to 1993, when I sat in the House of Commons on the government side.

I watched federal politics closely for more than 20 years before I returned in 2011. My experience in Parliament has taught me one thing: when the opposition systematically prevents Canadians—and in this case, first nations—from benefiting from a bill, the government should do everything it can to get the bill passed as quickly as possible, which is what we are doing.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

NDP

The Deputy Speaker NDP Joe Comartin

Order. It is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith the question necessary to dispose of the motion now before the House.

The vote is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

NDP

The Deputy Speaker NDP Joe Comartin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Yea.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

NDP

The Deputy Speaker NDP Joe Comartin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

Some hon. members

Nay.

Bill S-6—Time Allocation MotionFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 11:45 a.m.
See context

NDP

The Deputy Speaker NDP Joe Comartin

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And five or more members having risen:

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #746

First Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 12:25 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

I declare the motion carried.

The House resumed from May 28 consideration of the motion that Bill S-6, An Act respecting the election and term of office of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations and the composition of council of those First Nations, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Second ReadingFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 12:25 p.m.
See context

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

Order. When Bill S-6 was last before the House, the hon. member for Western Arctic had completed his speech. There are eight minutes remaining in questions and comments.

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Sherbrooke.

Second ReadingFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 12:30 p.m.
See context

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to be able to ask my colleague a question in response to his speech on Bill S-6, which we are debating today. This is another bill regarding first nations.

Every time we talk about first nations, we must remember that the government has a duty to consult when it is doing anything regarding rights, reserves or anything related to first nations.

I would like to ask my colleague whether consultations on Bill S-6 were done regarding elections on aboriginal reserves. If so, were the results of those consultations taken into account in the Bill S-6 we have before us today?

Second ReadingFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 12:30 p.m.
See context

NDP

Dennis Bevington NDP Western Arctic, NT

Mr. Speaker, of course, there were consultations that took place with two first nations groups in particular. However, the requirements that came out of those consultations were not met. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs has withdrawn its support for the bill. There is still some support from the Atlantic Policy Congress of First Nations Chiefs.

I want to read an email that I was copied on, which was directed to the parliamentary secretary for aboriginal affairs. It is from a person from Band 23 in New Brunswick. She says:

I was watching second reading of the Bill on CPAC last night (Tuesday May 28, 2013) and it brought to mind some interesting concerns regarding the process by which this legislation and others, has unfolded. You specifically mentioned an organization that supposedly represents the interests of the people in Atlantic Canada—the Atlantic Policy Congress of First Nations Chiefs—and praised their input in the process. And there was mention, I am not sure if it was by you, that Chiefs were asked to take this legislation back to their communities to solicit input from the people. Well, from a personal perspective there has been no consultation with the people in my community. In fact, you would be hard pressed to find someone who has any idea these changes....have been duly informed and have had an opportunity to question and comment. This has not been the case with Woodstock Band 23 in New Brunswick and if one community has been left out then I am sure there are others have been as well.

Second ReadingFirst Nations Elections ActGovernment Orders

June 11th, 2013 / 12:30 p.m.
See context

NDP

Jean Crowder NDP Nanaimo—Cowichan, BC

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for Western Arctic for his input on this piece of legislation and, of course, for the great work that he does on the aboriginal affairs committee.

There is one specific clause in the bill that I want to ask the member about, clause 41, which provides for governor-in-council to make regulations.

We just finished with Bill S-8 on safe drinking water, which was all about making regulations. The concern that was raised under Bill S-8, and I am sure it will be raised under Bill S-6, is the fact that there is no rigorous provision for first nations to be involved in making regulations. In fact, the NDP proposed an amendment to Bill S-8 that would see regulations come back before the House and tabled to the appropriate committee so that there would be parliamentary oversight.

Could the member comment on the fact that there is no provision in this piece of legislation for first nations to be involved in the development and implementation of regulations?