Evidence of meeting #10 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was estimates.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Wayne Smith  Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada
David Dolson  Director, Social Survey Methods, Statistics Canada
Johanne Denis  Director, Demography, Statistics Canada
Jean-Pierre Kingsley  Former Chief Electoral Officer, As an Individual

11:25 a.m.

Director, Demography, Statistics Canada

Johanne Denis

No, we weren't.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

That's interesting. Why not, do you think? Is that normal?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

I can't answer that question.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Let me ask, is it unusual?

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

David, I will let you come back in the next round. Your time is done on this one.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

All right, Mr. Chair. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much, Mr. Smith. I appreciate it.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Monsieur Dion, good to have you here today. You have seven minutes.

November 17th, 2011 / 11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Thank you so much, Mr. Chair.

Good morning to all three of you.

First of all, I would like to go back to a question posed by my colleague.

In previous bills presented by the same government, I believe that it was felt that this change was not appropriate. You were not consulted about which would be the best method to use, correct?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

The only thing that I can state is that none of the three individuals present here today have any recollection of such a consultation taking place. I cannot, however, categorically state that this never did occur.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Fine.

This time, however, the minister or the government asked you which would be the best method. Is that the question you were asked?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

Basically, we worked with the Privy Council Office. Representatives from this office asked us to make some presentations on the differences between census data and population estimate data, so that they could have a better understanding of the differences and establish which data was the most accurate.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

You told them, in your conclusion, that preliminary post-census estimates were the most accurate.

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

We provided them with information that led to such a conclusion.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Fine.

Are you comfortable with the fact that we are now using preliminary post-census estimates rather than census data?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

Yes, absolutely.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

All right.

The issue we are discussing is very important because that could make a difference of a few seats for each province, depending on which method is used. You are saying that in determining the proportion to be given to each province, you're going to be using the most accurate method, under the circumstances; but when it comes to the number of seats within these provinces, how are you going to proceed?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

As I mentioned in my presentation, we do not have adjusted estimates, however, the proportional discrepancy is the same, in theory, for the entire province. The committees that will be examining this issue will have no other choice but to use the unadjusted census data, as there are no other available options. Indeed, we do not have adjusted data for every town, city or row of houses.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

So we are using method B within each province, and method A for everything that is—

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

—for the breakdown between the provinces.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Will we not have problems when we have to decide on seat distribution within each province if we use two methods and switch back and forth between the two?

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

We may have problems when it comes to fairness within the province. The net under-coverage is not the same in a rural riding, where it normally is quite small, as compared to a large metropolitan area such as Toronto. Obviously, there is going to be a net undercoverage discrepancy between these two locations. If we try to establish ridings with the same populations, the urban centre will be at a disadvantage.

In reality, there are no other options. There is no data available, but there is for the provinces and the territories.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Pardon me, but you are in fact saying that we're going to be working from an estimate of the total population of a province when we have to compare the provinces with each other, but that this number will disappear when we start distributing seats within the province? We're going to take the figure obtained using method B and not obtained using method A when it comes to the total?

11:25 a.m.

An hon. member

Yes, that is correct.

11:25 a.m.

Chief StatisticianStatistics Canada

Wayne Smith

Essentially, you are right, but this does not come under my purview. I cannot speak on behalf of—

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Yes, it is under your purview, and I want to know if this creates a problem as far as the method is concerned.