Thank you, Mr. Chair.
First of all, thank you for the very useful information.
I have a question specifically for Ms. O'Brien about breaches of privilege, as was the case here.
I read in your excellent document that in a case in which—and this has happened in the past—it is recognized that there was a breach of privilege, but there's no way of identifying the source, nothing more can be done. A breach of privilege is recognized, and that's all.
In this case, it is quite clear that there was a breach of privilege, given that the minister received threats specifically related to his work. In fact, he was being asked to withdraw the bill. That being said, I think that Anonymous, as was said earlier, is something intangible. We can't even say it is an organization, because anyone can claim to be Anonymous and put that label on their actions. It is not an organized group taking concerted actions or something like that.
In this case, are we not in a situation where, because we won't be able to find the source, it will be impossible to take action?