Procedure and House Affairs Committee on May 29th, 2012
Evidence of meeting #39 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was year.
A recording is available from Parliament.
On the agenda
MPs speaking
Also speaking
- Marc Mayrand Chief Electoral Officer, Elections Canada
- Belaineh Deguefé Deputy Chief Electoral Officer, Policy, Planning and Public Affairs, Elections Canada
- Mark G. Watters Chief Financial Officer, House of Commons
- Audrey O'Brien Clerk of the House of Commons
12:40 p.m.
Clerk of the House of Commons
I believe so, Mr. Chair.
When it comes to approaching the reductions strategically, we plan to look at methods and practices that may be outdated. For instance, we are interested in using technology in a more strategic way, one that would enable us to provide members with the same level of service or better, without requiring the involvement of further human resources for a transaction.
I would say that the financial portal recently announced by the Speaker in a press release builds on that idea. It's an opportunity to establish similar ways of doing business. I am very hopeful that it will enable us to maintain our strategic approach and reach our objectives, while delivering the reductions promised further to the strategic review.
12:45 p.m.
NDP
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
12:45 p.m.
Liberal
Marc Garneau Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC
Mr. Chair, I don't have any questions for the Speaker or the Clerk.
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
John Williamson New Brunswick Southwest, NB
Thank you.
I'm curious. You expect savings of $5 million, yet you've requested $1.3 million, if I'm reading that correctly, in additional funding. Why the up before you go down?
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
Andrew Scheer Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK
There have been increased costs, and not every member is on the travel point system up to this point. As I mentioned in my speech, previously there had been surpluses used in other accounts to cover shortfalls. We've gone away from that system, partly because those surpluses in those other accounts aren't there any more. It will go up to reflect the increased costs for the last little bit, and then start to go down as the flight passes are implemented.
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
John Williamson New Brunswick Southwest, NB
What about spouses? They're not currently available for spouses, as I understand it.
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
Andrew Scheer Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK
Right. I'm not sure how the board addressed that, but I think Mark knows a little more about it.
12:45 p.m.
Chief Financial Officer, House of Commons
The thinking was that the spouses would not be allowed to use the flight passes because the flight passes have to be bought in booklets of ten. Members are responsible if those ten segments are not used. In a way, to protect members from unnecessary expense, it was decided by the BOIE at the time that flight passes would only be applicable to members for regular travel to regular points back and forth between Ottawa and the constituency, because there was a high likelihood that the full ten segments would be able to be used. Spousal travel is sometimes less predictable, and therefore it's probably best if a flight pass would not be purchased for the time being.
We're still definitely open to studying that question further. We're only dipping our toes in the water of flight passes with this initiative. Should utilization prove that the full flight passes could be used, there would be no reason we wouldn't want to extend it to spouses, but for the time being it is restricted to members.
May 29th, 2012 / 12:45 p.m.
Conservative
John Williamson New Brunswick Southwest, NB
I would urge you to allow members to opt in if they choose. As you said, they—and not the House of Commons and ultimately not taxpayers—are responsible for them if they are not used. It's one more avenue that could be used to save taxpayers additional money, because there are a lot of young members in the House whose families travel with them frequently.
I have another question. It's geared towards the Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, if there were a case in which moneys were spent inappropriately and that question were referred to the BOIE and the BOIE agreed with that—if mail, for example, were improperly used—what would be the sanction after that? Would it go back to the House of Commons? How would the BOIE resolve that? Or would it come to this committee?
12:45 p.m.
Conservative
Andrew Scheer Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK
With my short experience on the board—I've been on it for only about a year—I would say that the board looks at each situation and takes appropriate action that it deems necessary in each case.
12:45 p.m.
Conservative