Evidence of meeting #38 for Justice and Human Rights in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was trafficking.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Tim Lambrinos  Executive Director, Ontario Region, Adult Entertainment Association of Canada
Rudi Czekalla  Consultant, Principal, Municipal Policy Consultants, Adult Entertainment Association of Canada
Glendene Grant  Founder, Mothers Against Trafficking Humans
Amy Lebovitch  Executive Director, Sex Professionals of Canada
Valerie Scott  Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada
Eric Jolliffe  Chief of Police, Office of the Chief Police, York Regional Police
Gunilla Ekberg  Lawyer, University of Glasgow School of Law, As an Individual
Thai Truong  Drugs and Vice, York Regional Police

11 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Okay.

I'm sure you're familiar with the Bedford decision and Chief Justice McLachlin's statements and comments in her decision.

I'll just read one point to you. She said:

This reflects a policy choice on Parliament’s part. Parliament is not precluded from imposing limits on where and how prostitution may be conducted, as long as it does so in a way that does not infringe the constitutional rights of prostitutes.

What is she referring to, in terms of—?

11 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

What is Chief Justice McLachlin referring to?

11 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Yes, what is she referring to? I specifically want you to focus on the words “imposing limits on where and how prostitution may be conducted”. You say we can just let it fall away, but she's saying that Parliament has the right to impose “limits on where and how prostitution may be conducted”. What do you think she's referring to in that phrase?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

What do I think...?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

What do you think Chief Justice McLachlin is referring to?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

She did mention that, “if it so chooses”—and obviously you do so choose. It's not a necessary thing for you to do. But I think it's extremely important to scrap this bill in its entirety, and if you're going to do this, come at it from a different approach.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Fair enough; I take your point.

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

Bring sex workers to the table, but for real. The sex workers were not consulted.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

But what do you think Parliament's role is in regulating and imposing limits on where and how prostitution may be conducted? She said Parliament has the right to do that. Do you agree or disagree with her?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

Do I agree with the statement?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Yes. Do you agree with the Chief Justice's statement that Parliament has the right to impose limits on prostitution?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

Yes, it does have the right to do so.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Do you think she's right?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

I agree that it has the right to do so—

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

All right. So let me ask you the next question.

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

—but it must do so in a way that doesn't start killing us all over again.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

I understand, and that's there, and we read that.

The next question, though is: what is the federal jurisdiction that you would see the government using to comply with her statement that Parliament has the right to impose such limits?

You mentioned labour law; you mentioned employment law; others have mentioned zoning law. None of those are in the jurisdiction of the federal Government of Canada.

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

That's right.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

So why did Chief Justice McLachlin say that Parliament has the right to impose limits?

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

Well, it does so already. There are many laws on the books that deal with sex work and the exploitation of it.

For example, as I opened with, we only challenged one-tenth of the avails law. There's quite a list, almost like a catalogue, of other offences.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

Those weren't struck down, so that's not what she was referring to.

11:05 a.m.

Legal Coordinator, Sex Professionals of Canada

Valerie Scott

I beg your pardon? That's what I'm referring to.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Bob Dechert Conservative Mississauga—Erindale, ON

That's not what she struck down, so that's not what she was referring to.

Okay, thank you, Mr. Chair.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Mike Wallace

Your time is up. Thank you very much. Thank you for those questions and answers.

Our next questioner is from the New Democratic Party, Mr. Jacob.

July 9th, 2014 / 11:05 a.m.

NDP

Pierre Jacob NDP Brome—Missisquoi, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I want to thank our witnesses for being here today.

Like my colleagues, I have a lot of compassion for you, Ms. Grant, and what you've been through.

My first question is for Mr. Jolliffe.

In your opening statement, you talked about substance abuse. Right now, are the mental health and substance abuse services available to prostitutes and vulnerable women adequate in your region, as well as across the province and around the country?