Evidence of meeting #6 for Subcommittee on Private Members' Business in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was item.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Alexandre Lavoie  Committee Researcher

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

A vote has already been held in the House. So this is fine, but a vote has already been held.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

This is a custom. This way to proceed is not related to the criteria; it has to do with the committee's customs. Correct?

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

Yes, that's right.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

So the chair rules on matters related to customs.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

I could look at the history in order to find out where this criterion comes from, as I'm not sure.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

If the chair is satisfied that this is a custom, I'm fine with it.

October 7th, 2014 / 1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Frank Valeriote Liberal Guelph, ON

I think as well there's probably some sufficient difference between the actual wording—and I know where you're coming from—of the motion of which you speak and the wording and the requirements of this. There's a point where it diverges from exactly what the motion was, and I think this diverges sufficiently from the motion that it makes it different in its requirements.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

I don't have to make the analysis on both for that. I followed the practice not to consider bills against motions, but I could do that if you want.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Do you want to stand it down and let the analyst...?

1:20 p.m.

A voice

No.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

That sounds good.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Well, are we okay to let it go forward?

1:20 p.m.

A voice

Yes.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Okay.

Next is Bill C-603.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

The bill amends the Motor Vehicle Safety Act to prohibit the manufacture or importing of heavy vehicles not equipped with side guards.

The bill does not concern a question that is outside federal jurisdiction. It does not clearly violate the Constitution Act. It does not concern a question that is substantially the same as one already voted on by the House of Commons. It does not concern a question that is currently on the order paper or notice paper as an item of government business.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Okay.

Next is M-534.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

It proposes that the government work with the provinces, the territories, and first nations, Inuit, and Métis communities to eradicate child poverty in Canada by developing a national poverty reduction plan.

The motion does not concern a question that is outside federal jurisdiction. It does not clearly violate the Constitution Act. It does not concern a question that is substantially the same as one already voted on by the House of Commons in a different session. It does not concern a question that is currently on the order paper or notice paper as an item of government business.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Is everyone satisfied? It's M-534.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Frank Valeriote Liberal Guelph, ON

We just dealt with that.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Yes, we're dealing with it. Are you comfortable with it?

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Frank Valeriote Liberal Guelph, ON

Yes.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Next is Bill C-622.

1:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Alexandre Lavoie

The bill amends the National Defence Act to provide for an independent review of the operations of the Communications Security Establishment and enacts an act to establish the intelligence and security committee of Parliament act.

The bill does not concern a question that is outside federal jurisdiction. It does not clearly violate the Constitution Act. It does not concern a question that is substantially the same as one already voted on by the House of Commons. It does not concern a question that is currently on the order paper or notice paper as an item of government business.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Dave MacKenzie

Is Bill C-622 okay?