Debates of Nov. 26th, 1999
House of Commons Hansard #29 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was tourism.
Topics
- Canadian Tourism Commission Act
- Crime Prevention
- Immigration
- Tobacco
- Child Poverty
- Science And Engineering
- Rights Of Youth
- Government Of Ontario
- Chechnya
- Regional Development
- Hockey
- Liberal Party Of Canada
- The Late Doug Sahm
- Democracy
- Football
- Public Works
- Canada Post
- Canada Elections Act
- Employment
- Hockey
- National Unity
- Referendums
- Sudan
- Banking
- Referendums
- Taxation
- National Defence
- Taxation
- Trade
- Poverty
- Social Housing
- Agriculture
- Trade
- Regional Economic Development
- Mining Industry
- Rcmp
- Gun Control
- Housing
- Fisheries
- Health
- Tobacco
- Genetically Modified Foods
- Child Poverty
- Fisheries
- Rural Development
- Airport Safety
- Treaties Ratified In 1991 And 1992
- Technology Partnerships Canada
- Government Response To Petitions
- Committees Of The House
- Criminal Code
- Canadian Forces Superannuation Act
- Competition Act
- Maximum Speed Control Device Act
- Wages Liability Act
- Privacy Act
- Land Titles Act
- Pension Fund Societies Act
- Insurance Companies Act
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act
- Indian Act
- Hazardous Products Act
- Government Employees Compensation Act
- Extradition Act
- Interpretation Act
- Canadian Child Rights Act
- Territorial Lands Act
- Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act
- Criminal Code
- Canada Transportation Act
- Divorce Act
- Excise Tax Act
- Excise Act
- Corrections And Conditional Release Act
- Canada-United Kingdom Civil And Commercial Judgments Convention Act
- Canada Co-Operative Associations Act
- Canada Student Loans Act
- Canada Shipping Act
- Canada Health Act
- Departmental Internal Audit Act
- Canada Pension Plan
- Divorce Act
- Canada Business Corporations Act
- Bills Of Exchange Act
- Canadian Bill Of Rights
- National Standards For Education Act
- National Literacy Standards Act
- Canadian Bill Of Rights
- Immigration Act
- Committees Of The House
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Canadian Tourism Commission Act
- Witness Protection Program Act
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
Reform
Dick Harris Prince George—Bulkley Valley, BC
Just a point of clarification, Mr. Speaker. When will my colleague from the Okanagan be permitted to speak?
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)
We are not going to negotiate this. We are going into questions and comments.
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
Reform
Dick Harris Prince George—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I am under the impression that we are still discussing my options. I have my options figured out now and I would like to make a decision to continue my speech, if I may.
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)
We have unanimous consent for the hon. member for Prince George—Bulkley Valley to split his time. Do we have unanimous consent to rescind the previous decision?
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
Reform
Dick Harris Prince George—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my colleagues. I know they were enjoying my presentation so much they shuddered to think that I was going to finish up quickly.
Since coming to Ottawa a little more than six years ago, the experiences we have had in dealing with crown corporations have not been exactly fruitful or satisfying. Whenever we try to get information about how taxpayers' money is being spent, we get a pretty big run around.
I learned very quickly after coming to Ottawa that crown corporations simply do not have to tell us anything about how they operate if they do not want to. We made a number of requests through access to information to get some information about certain crown corporations and we hit a brick wall, to put it fairly specifically.
The minister will say that this new entity is at arm's length and he is not responsible. The minister should be responsible to the House for how taxpayers' money is spent. He should not be permitted to duck this responsibility by turning the CTC into a crown corporation.
I am sure you will understand this, Mr. Speaker, because you have been a member of the House for some time.
The minute the crown corporation is formed it will immediately begin to plead that the confidentiality of its private or commercial stakeholders will be compromised if it starts talking about how it spends its money or how it operates its little business.
Canadian Tourism Commission Act
Government Orders
10:55 a.m.
The Deputy Speaker
I am sorry to interrupt the hon. member, but it is time that we moved to the next item of business which is called for at 11 o'clock. Accordingly the hon. member will have eight minutes remaining in the time allotted for his remarks following question period.
Crime Prevention
Statements By Members
10:55 a.m.
Liberal
Andrew Telegdi Kitchener—Waterloo, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo is a leader in crime prevention.
The Community Safety and Crime Prevention Council was established in the region in 1993. This community based organization committed to preventing crime was so successful that it was one of the models for the establishment of the federal government's $32 million per year national strategy on community safety and crime prevention of which the National Crime Prevention Centre is a part.
The recently announced partnership between the centre and the Insurance Council of Canada to reduce auto theft is welcome but not surprising. The insurance industry in my community has supported local crime prevention efforts for many years.
This joint initiative takes a particular interest in preventing children from being drawn into automobile theft. Currently 43% of convicted car thieves are between the ages of 12 and 17. With the rate of auto theft rising and the resulting $48 a year increase in insurance premiums for consumers, this initiative between government and property and casualty insurers in communities across the country is a logical and timely one. Well done.
Immigration
Statements By Members
10:55 a.m.
Reform
Keith Martin Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, BC
Mr. Speaker, 599 people came from China by boat and landed on British Columbia shores this summer. Of those 599, only one has been determined to be a true refugee. Months later, 389 claims have yet to be dealt with. The minister's response? Bill C-16, which has said absolutely nothing about this issue. It does nothing about streamlining our immigration process. It gives a green light to the indentured slavery that this immigration scam represents. It does nothing to help true refugees. It does nothing to help our immigration process.
Today, Central American refugees are selling drugs on Vancouver streets and can still apply through our refugee process. Today, true refugees are mixed with false refugees and we have an immigration process that is in disarray.
Today, I am introducing a private member's bill, seconded by the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands, that would streamline this process.
To the Minister of Immigration: Get with the program. Introduce changes that are fair to everyone, fair to refugees—
Immigration
Statements By Members
11 a.m.
The Deputy Speaker
The hon. member for Nepean—Carleton.
Tobacco
Statements By Members
11 a.m.
Liberal
David Pratt Nepean—Carleton, ON
Mr. Speaker, tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Canada, accounting for 45,000 deaths each year.
We know that 85% of all adults who smoke started the habit before the age of 18. Smoking rates for Canadian youth are increasing at an alarming rate. Twenty-nine per cent of 15 to 19 year olds now smoke, and in some groups, like the Inuit for instance, around 71% of youth are smoking.
I would like to welcome to Ottawa 17 young people from across Canada. They are all members of the newly established youth advisory committee on tobacco issues which will be advising the Minister of Health and the Secretary of State for Children and Youth on smoking and tobacco issues from a young person's perspective.
These youths were selected on the basis of their work in their own communities and their interest and experience in discouraging tobacco use by their peers. We look forward to their input on this life and death issue.
Child Poverty
Statements By Members
November 26th, 1999 / 11 a.m.
Liberal
John Maloney Erie—Lincoln, ON
Mr. Speaker, we have observed the 10th anniversary of a unanimous House of Commons resolution to eliminate child poverty by the year 2000. Regrettably and sadly, this goal is beyond our grasp. Our noble expectations lie in failure.
Today, we observe poor families falling deeper into poverty and the gap widening between their incomes and those of well off families.
Children are our greatest assets, our greatest treasures. We must reaffirm our desire, indeed our necessity, to work much harder to include the unincluded in society.
The government has signalled its intention to act and the foundation has been put in place for a national children's agenda. Intentions must become reality and the reality must be now. Children are a priority of this government.
Science And Engineering
Statements By Members
11 a.m.
Liberal
Yvon Charbonneau Anjou—Rivière-Des-Prairies, QC
Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Canadian government announced a $1 million science and engineering research prize in honour of the late Gerhard Herzberg, winner of Canada's first Nobel prize for research in chemistry.
The annual award is a millennium project of NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and is intended to honour and support the best of Canada's researchers.
Such an initiative is particularly important as we rapidly approach the new millennium, since it will enable Canada to continue to play a lead role in the international scientific world.
We wish all the young Canadians who will have an opportunity to take advantage of this the best of luck.
Rights Of Youth
Statements By Members
11 a.m.
Reform
Grant McNally Dewdney—Alouette, BC
Mr. Speaker, last week the Liberal government fully endorsed an election for the rights of youth. Only 3.8% of all Canadian students participated in this exercise, yet access to information documents obtained by the Reform Party revealed that the human resources department intends to “after the election, publish and present to the PMO the children's youth mandate”. What a mandate, 3.8%.
This Liberal exercise cost taxpayers half a million dollars and was done without the approval of parents, school boards or provincial ministers of education.
Access documents revealed that the human resources department asks “Where can HRDC get the most mileage?”
Is this the Liberal government's new strategy, to use children for partisan purposes to support its own political agenda?
Government Of Ontario
Statements By Members
11 a.m.
Liberal
Judi Longfield Whitby—Ajax, ON
Mr. Speaker, so much for the Mike Harris tax cuts and sound financial management in the province of Ontario.
After the people of Ontario have finished shelling out thousands of extra dollars in new user fees, drug co-payments, higher municipal property taxes, paying for important services that used to be covered by OHIP and whopping tuition fees, they will not be any better off than they were five years ago.
The reform-a-tory government at Queen's Park will even charge a $125 fee to single parents with children to collect child support payments. Students now have to call a 1-900 number and pay if they want information about their student loans.
While most jurisdictions are increasing support for post-secondary education, Mike Harris, who already is the lowest per capita funder of post-secondary education in North America, will now cut an additional $800 million from our education system.
The Tories are demanding that municipalities, on whom they have already downloaded huge financial burdens, pay 30% of capital projects for hospitals.
The people of Ontario do not even get a balanced budget in return for the destruction of their social fabric.
