Debates of Sept. 26th, 2000
House of Commons Hansard #122 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was animals.
Topics
- Government Response To Petitions
- Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Business Of The House
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Criminal Code
- The Parliament Buildings
- Churches
- Liberal Party Of Canada
- Anne Montminy
- Laryssa Bissenthal
- Softwood Lumber
- Canadian Hot Air Balloon Championship
- Gary O'Dwyer
- Taxation
- Canadian Alliance
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Asbestos
- Mercaz
- Employment Insurance
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Brain Tumour Foundation Of Canada
- Agriculture
- Atlantic Canadians
- Taxation
- Young Offenders Act
- The Environment
- National Defence
- Fisheries
- Budget Surpluses
- Correctional Service Canada
- Transportation Of Mox
- Correctional Service Canada
- Employment Insurance
- Yugoslavia
- Health
- Child Care
- Fuel Taxes
- Forest Products
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Gasoline Pricing
- Employment Insurance
- Education
- Penitentiaries
- Presence In Gallery
- Criminal Code
- 1911 Census Records
- Division No. 1387
- Supply
- Division No. 1388
- Division No. 1389
- Financial Consumer Agency Of Canada Act
- Division No. 1390
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Division No. 1391
- Division No. 1392
- Division No. 1393
Division No. 1387
Private Members' Business
September 26th, 2000 / 6:50 p.m.
Independent
John Nunziata York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, perhaps you can assist me. As I understand it that was a private members' vote and it would be inconsistent to have a division on a private members' vote. Could you indicate whether a private members' vote could be dealt with in such a fashion?
Division No. 1387
Private Members' Business
6:50 p.m.
The Speaker
The vote was in order.
The House resumed from September 21 consideration of the motion and the amendment.
Supply
Government Orders
6:50 p.m.
The Speaker
Pursuant to order made Wednesday, September 20 the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment relating to the business of supply. The vote is on the amendment. All those in favour of the amendment will please rise. Is it defeated on division?
Supply
Government Orders
6:50 p.m.
Some hon. members
No.
Supply
Government Orders
6:55 p.m.
The Speaker
Order, please. I address myself to the government whip. Are you making a motion that this motion be negatived by the House without a vote? Is that correct?
Supply
Government Orders
6:55 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe if you were to seek the consent of the House, you would receive consent to have this matter negatived on division.
Supply
Government Orders
6:55 p.m.
The Speaker
Does the government whip have the consent of the House to put the motion?
Supply
Government Orders
6:55 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Supply
Government Orders
6:55 p.m.
Some hon. members
No.
(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1388
Government Orders
7:05 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare the amendment lost.
The next question is on the main motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Division No. 1388
Government Orders
7:05 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Division No. 1388
Government Orders
7:05 p.m.
Some hon. members
No.
Division No. 1388
Government Orders
7:05 p.m.
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Division No. 1388
Government Orders
7:05 p.m.
Some hon. members
Yea.