Debates of Sept. 26th, 2000
House of Commons Hansard #122 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was animals.
Topics
- Government Response To Petitions
- Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Business Of The House
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Criminal Code
- The Parliament Buildings
- Churches
- Liberal Party Of Canada
- Anne Montminy
- Laryssa Bissenthal
- Softwood Lumber
- Canadian Hot Air Balloon Championship
- Gary O'Dwyer
- Taxation
- Canadian Alliance
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Asbestos
- Mercaz
- Employment Insurance
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Brain Tumour Foundation Of Canada
- Agriculture
- Atlantic Canadians
- Taxation
- Young Offenders Act
- The Environment
- National Defence
- Fisheries
- Budget Surpluses
- Correctional Service Canada
- Transportation Of Mox
- Correctional Service Canada
- Employment Insurance
- Yugoslavia
- Health
- Child Care
- Fuel Taxes
- Forest Products
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Gasoline Pricing
- Employment Insurance
- Education
- Penitentiaries
- Presence In Gallery
- Criminal Code
- 1911 Census Records
- Division No. 1387
- Supply
- Division No. 1388
- Division No. 1389
- Financial Consumer Agency Of Canada Act
- Division No. 1390
- Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
- Division No. 1391
- Division No. 1392
- Division No. 1393
Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
Liberal
André Harvey Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, I vote nay on this motion.
Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
Reform
Jake Hoeppner Portage—Lisgar, MB
Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes yes.
Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation Act
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
Bloc
Réjean Lefebvre Champlain, QC
Mr. Speaker, I will be voting in favour of this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1391
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 1 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 2 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 3.
Division No. 1391
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote on Motion No. 1 to the motion now before the House.
Division No. 1391
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 1391
Government Orders
7:20 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
September 26th, 2000 / 7:20 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 3 lost.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
Kenora—Rainy River
Ontario
Liberal
Bob Nault Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yea.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
Reform
John Reynolds West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present vote yes and I would mention that the hon. member for Skeena has left.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
Bloc
Stéphane Bergeron Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members will be voting against the motion.
Division No. 1392
Government Orders
7:25 p.m.
NDP
