Debates of March 28th, 2001
House of Commons Hansard #38 of the 37th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was new.
Topics
- Canadian Cancer Society
- Transportation
- Canadian Cancer Society
- American Bar Association
- Ara Sarafian
- Agriculture
- Canadian Ski Championships
- Social Housing
- Outaouais Tourist Industry
- Taxation
- Nunavut
- Freshwater Exports
- Organized Crime
- Arts And Culture
- Softwood Lumber
- Prime Minister
- Trade
- Prime Minister
- Ethics Counsellor
- Multiculturalism
- Employment
- Prime Minister
- Foreign Affairs
- Prime Minister
- Multiculturalism
- Ethics Counsellor
- Multiculturalism
- Health
- Multiculturalism
- Code Of Ethics
- Privilege
- Points Of Order
- Government Response To Petitions
- Food And Drugs Act
- National Horse Of Canada Act
- Statistics Act
- Treaties Act
- Tabling Of Treaties Act
- Treaty Approval Act
- Treaty Publication Act
- Conclusion Of Treaties Act
- Fuel Price Posting Act
- Canada Elections Act
- Income Tax Act
- Farm Income Protection Act
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Motions For Papers
- Canada Foundation For Sustainable Development Technology Act
- Points Of Order
- Canada Foundation For Sustainable Development Technology Act
- Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act
- Financial Consumer Agency Act
- Division No. 39
- Division No. 47
- Division No. 40
- Division No. 41
- Division No. 42
- Division No. 43
- Division No. 52
- Division No. 44
- Division No. 53
- Canada Foundation For Sustainable Development Technology Act
- Division No. 54
- Division No. 58
- Division No. 59
- Education
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 12 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 13.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Liberal
Marlene Catterall Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, you will find unanimous consent that those recorded as voting on the previous motion be recorded as voting on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting no.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
The Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Canadian Alliance
John Reynolds West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast, BC
Mr. Speaker, the Canadian Alliance members present will be voting yes to the motion.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Bloc
Stéphane Bergeron Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members are in favour of the motion.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
NDP
Yvon Godin Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Mr. Speaker, the members of the NDP present will be voting no to the motion.
Division No. 41
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Progressive Conservative
Gerald Keddy South Shore, NS
Mr. Speaker, the members of the PC Party vote yes to the motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 13, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 42
Government Orders
March 28th, 2001 / 6:05 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 13 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 2.
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:05 p.m.
Liberal
Marlene Catterall Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent that those recorded as having voting on the previous motion be recorded as having voting on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting no, and the same vote applying to Motions Nos. 10, 11 and 3 to 7.
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:10 p.m.
The Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this way?
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:10 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:10 p.m.
Canadian Alliance
John Reynolds West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present will be voting no.
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:10 p.m.
Bloc
Stéphane Bergeron Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members support this motion.
Division No. 42
Government Orders
6:10 p.m.
NDP
Yvon Godin Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Mr. Speaker, New Democrats present will be voting yes to this motion.