House of Commons Hansard #64 of the 37th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was children.

Topics

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those opposed will please say nay.

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And more than five members having risen:

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Call in the members.

And the bells having rung:

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Catterall Liberal Ottawa West—Nepean, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I ask that a recorded division on the proposed motion be deferred until Tuesday at the end of government orders.

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is there unanimous consent to defer the division until Tuesday at the end of government orders?

Divorce ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-2, an act to establish a process for assessing the environmental and socio-economic effects of certain activities in Yukon, as reported (with amendment) from the committee.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

There is one motion in amendment standing on the Notice Paper for the report stage of Bill C-2. Motion No. 1 will be debated and voted upon.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Edmonton Southeast Alberta

Liberal

David Kilgour Liberalfor the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development

moved:

That Bill C-2 be amended by deleting subclause 122(2).

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

John Finlay Liberal Oxford, ON

Mr. Speaker, the purpose of the amendment as was read was to remove subclause 122(2) of the bill.

While I believe in the object that the standing committee was hoping to achieve with their amendment to the clause, the problems with the amendment can be addressed and the underlying objective can be adequately accommodated through the original bill clause and existing processes. I will try to explain why.

The standing committee amendment to clause 122 has a number of deficiencies that would prove problematic.

Perhaps principal among these is the fact that the committee's amendment does not take into account that there is a second regulation making provision in the bill in subclause 47(1). It is under this provision that the project regulations would be made and hon. members should know that these regulations are the ones that will be of the most interest to the public and industry and environmental interest groups.

Second, the proposed new subclause 122(2) does not provide for a role for the other place. Under current practice, regulations are reviewed by the Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations, a committee of both the House and the other place. We believe this is appropriate and should be maintained for regulations made under Bill C-2.

The amendment proposed by the standing committee could also prove problematic as it names a specific standing committee in a statute. As the names and functions of House committees could change over time, the provision could be rendered ineffective unless there was an amendment to the bill.

I would like to spend a few minutes explaining why I believe the bill does not require the amendment suggested by the committee to provide opportunities for public involvement in the regulatory process under the bill.

First, I would like to remind hon. members of one of the key features of the bill, referred to at length during the second reading debate in the House: extensive consultations on the bill.

The fact is that there have already been considerable consultations conducted regarding what the public and interest groups think should be included in the two key areas of regulations under the bill, and that is those that establish what activities are subject to assessment and regulations and those establishing time lines within which decisions must be made.

In addition to those consultations that have already occurred, I note that clause 122 of the bill already requires the minister to consult with the government of Yukon and all Yukon first nations prior to making regulations. These consultations have also been ongoing for some time now. I am confident that when these regulations are drafted, consideration of all this input will be reflected.

I would also like to remind hon. members that before regulations are finalized they are pre-published in the Canada Gazette with an opportunity for public review and comment on them. This provides yet another opportunity for public and interest group input to these regulations.

Finally, these regulations will be reviewed by the Standing Joint Committee on the Scrutiny of Regulations. As hon. members know, this is a joint committee of the House and the other place. The addition of subclause 122(2) would, therefore, only serve to duplicate existing processes for this place, while providing no role for the other place.

I believe that hon. members can be confident that there will be numerous opportunities for input by the public and interest groups, the Yukon government and first nations into the development of all regulations under the bill. Further, including subclause 122(2) would only be problematic and serve to duplicate existing processes. I also believe that all hon. members recognize these problems and will join me in supporting the motion to remove subclause 122(2) of the bill.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is the House ready for the question?

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

The question is on Motion No. 1. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those opposed will please say nay.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And more than five members having risen:

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Call in the members.

And the bells having rung:

Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment ActGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Accordingly, the vote is deferred until tomorrow.