Debates of Sept. 20th, 2010
House of Commons Hansard #66 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was funding.
Topics
- Question Period
- Vacancies
- Board of Internal Economy
- Message from the Senate
- Corporate Accountability of Mining, Oil and Gas Corporations in Developing Countries Act
- Combating Terrorism Act
- Firearms Registry
- Lake Winnipeg
- Old Rivière-Bleue Train Station
- Chinese Canadians
- Firearms Registry
- Honorary Naval Captain
- Battle of Britain
- Nutrition North Program
- Lobbying Act
- Multiple Sclerosis
- The Economy
- Status of Women
- The Economy
- The Conservative Government
- Liberal Party of Canada
- Firearms Registry
- Government Spending
- Firearms Registry
- Employment Insurance
- Foreign Takeovers
- Census
- National Defence
- Census
- Employment Insurance
- Public Safety
- Government Advertising
- Health
- Government Spending
- Pensions
- Health
- Veterans Affairs
- Government Communications
- Shale Gas
- International Co-operation
- Lobbying Act
- Points of Order
- Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
- Land Claim Agreements
- Government Response to Petitions
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Starred Questions
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Request for Emergency Debate
- Combating Terrorism Act
Question No. 353
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, the purpose of the Nanisivik Naval Facility is to have an upgraded berthing capability with a modern fuel farm and a small administrative, services and utilities building. In November 2009, a design contract for just under $900,000 was awarded to WorleyParsons Westmar Limited from North Vancouver, British Columbia. This is the first of the project’s four design phases. The initial design phase is complete and phase two will be awarded shortly. Phase two will provide a recommended option that will lay the foundation for the remaining design phases.
In addition to design work, detailed studies such as geotechnical investigations, wharf structural inspection, topographical and environmental assessment will be required.
It is anticipated that major construction work at the Nanisivik Naval Facility could begin in 2012, once all the necessary assessments are completed, approvals are in place and clean up of the former facility is finished or sufficiently completed in order to have access to the site. Completion of the Nanisivik Naval Facility is scheduled for 2015.
Starred Questions
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, would you be so kind as to call Starred Question No. 331. I ask that the question and answer to Question No. 331 be printed in Hansard as if read.
*Question No. 331
Starred Questions
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Marlene Jennings Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC
With respect to the funding from the Canadian International Development Agency, and in follow-up to the January 21, 2010 letter from KAIROS addressed to the Prime Minister: (a) for what reasons was KAIROS recently refused funding; and (b) does either the Prime Minister or the Minister of International Cooperation intend to meet directly with this organization to discuss this issue?
*Question No. 331
Starred Questions
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Durham
Ontario
Conservative
Bev Oda Minister of International Cooperation
Mr. Speaker, In response to (a), KAIROS was recently refused funding as it was determined that KAIROS’ 2009 program proposal did not meet the government's priorities. Unlike many other NGOs making proposals to CIDA, KAIROS is a coalition of several member organizations, some of which continue to receive separate funding from CIDA. KAIROS submitted a new proposal in April 2010, which is now undergoing CIDA’s standard evaluation process.
In response to (b), the Minister of International Cooperation met with KAIROS on December 8, 2009.
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
September 20th, 2010 / 3:20 p.m.
Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, supplementary responses to Question No. 163 originally tabled on May 11, 2010 and Question No. 175 originally answered on May 25, 2010 will be tabled today.
Mr. Speaker, if Questions Nos. 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 253, 254, 255, 257, 258, 260, 264, 265, 267, 268, 269, 270, 272, 273, 274, 276, 277, 278, 283, 285, 288, 289, 290, 292, 293, 294, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 309, 311, 313, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 324, 325, 328, 332, 334, 335, 336, 339, 341, 342, 344, 345, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352 and 354 could be made orders for returns, these returns would be tabled immediately.
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Question No. 163
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
Harold Albrecht Kitchener—Conestoga, ON
With respect to the use of the government-owned fleet of Challenger jets from January 2002 until January 2006 and for each use of the aircraft: (a) what are the names and titles of the passengers present on the flight manifest; (b) what were all the departure and arrival points of the aircraft; (c) who requested access to the fleet; (d) who authorized the flight; (e) what is the number of flying hours accumulated; and (f) what are the associated costs?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 175
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
NDP
Pat Martin Winnipeg Centre, MB
With regard to all government advertising to promote the Government of Canada and budget initiatives, such as Canada’s Economic Action plan, from January 1, 2006 to March 30, 2010: (a) how much has been spent on an annual basis on combined advertising, by department and budgetary initiative; (b) by how much did the government’s overall advertising budget increase or decrease during that period; (c) was any completed advertising audited or rejected for not adhering to Treasury Board rules and, if so, (i) what advertising, (ii) what was the total value of rejected or audited advertising; (d) what advertising was related to tax relief and what was its total cost by year; (e) what companies received contracts to complete this advertising work and what is the total cost, by department and budgetary initiative, on an annual basis; (f) how much has been spent per province on an annual basis; and (g) what contracts were awarded without tender and what is the total amount, by department and budgetary initiative, on an annual basis?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 241
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Ruby Dhalla Brampton—Springdale, ON
With regard to government spending on Google adWords since January 2006: (a) how much has each department spent; (b) what keywords were chosen; (c) what daily limits were set; (d) what was the cost of each keyword; and (e) how many clicks were made per keyword?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 242
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Ruby Dhalla Brampton—Springdale, ON
With regard to government action on tuberculosis (TB) since January 2006: (a) what national and international programs are being operated by the government to combat the disease; (b) how much money has the government spent on those programs in each year since January 2006; (c) what is the rate of TB in Canada for each month since January 2006; (d) what is the mortality rate for TB in Canada for each year since January 2006; and (e) what research to combat the disease is being funded by the government?
(Return tabled)
