Debates of Oct. 3rd, 2011
House of Commons Hansard #25 of the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was senate.
Topics
- Question Period
- Ways and Means
- Senate Reform Act
- National Seniors Day
- Seniors
- Human Trafficking
- National Seniors Day
- Religious Freedom
- Mental Illness Awareness Week
- Harvest for Hunger
- Women's History Month
- FRAPRU Social Housing Organization
- Mental Health
- International Seniors Day
- Sales Tax Harmonization
- Bras d'Or Lakes
- Democratic Reform
- Nancy Riche
- New Democratic Party of Canada
- The Economy
- Taxation
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Judicial Independence
- The Economy
- Employment
- Afghanistan
- Ethics
- The Environment
- Ethics
- G8 Summit
- Public Safety
- G8 Summit
- St. Laurence Seaway
- Status of Women
- Justice
- Search and Rescue
- The Environment
- Taxation
- Health
- Seniors
- Religious Freedom
- Sales Tax harmonization
- Flooding in Montérégie
- Committees of the House
- Canada Labour Code
- Newfoundland and Labrador Fishery Rebuilding Act
- Preventing Persons from Concealing Their Identity during Riots and Unlawful Assemblies Act
- Criminal Code
- Importation of Intoxicating Liquors Act
- Democratic Representation Act
- Food and Drugs Act
- Breast Density Awareness Act
- Canada Labour Code
- Employment Insurance Act
- Income Tax Act
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Old Age Security Act
- Preventing Human Smugglers from Abusing Canada's Immigration System Act
- Business of Supply
- Ways and Means
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
NDP
Thomas Mulcair Outremont, QC
Mr. Speaker, at this time the Conservatives are saddling future generations with the biggest environmental, economic and social debt in our history. Since coming to power, they have gutted the manufacturing sector and destabilized our previously balanced economy, which Canada has built up since the second world war. There is a great void—except for tax reductions for the banks that make $22 billion profits.
When will they invest in good quality jobs for young people, who will have to foot the bill?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Mégantic—L'Érable
Québec
Conservative
Christian Paradis Minister of Industry and Minister of State (Agriculture)
Mr. Speaker, let us stick to the facts. Our low tax plan has resulted in the creation of 600,000 net new jobs since 2009. Canada's economic leadership is recognized internationally. What we do know is that the NDP is pushing a plan that would increase our tax burden by $10 billion a year. We know that it would kill the economy and that is definitely not the direction that this government will take.
Employment
Oral Questions
October 3rd, 2011 / 2:30 p.m.
NDP
Libby Davies Vancouver East, BC
Mr. Speaker, in the last federal election New Democrats put forward a solid proposal to support small businesses, the real job creators in our economy. This plan applied to all employers and gave them room to hire and retain more staff. The government could have enacted it immediately, thus supporting Canadian businesses and staving off rising unemployment numbers.
Why does the government prefer to blow billions on corporate tax cuts with no guarantee a single job will be created?
Employment
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Saint Boniface
Manitoba
Conservative
Shelly Glover Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, I will repeat one more time that 600,000 jobs have been created.
As far as we compare to the rest of the world, Canada's GDP and employment have both recovered to pre-crisis levels, outperforming all of the G7 countries. We are proud of that. We are proud of the measures we have put forward with our economic action plan, and wait for it, the next phase is about to come.
Employment
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
NDP
Libby Davies Vancouver East, BC
Mr. Speaker, we know that we have not recovered the jobs from that recession.
We know that the New Democrat job creation plan makes more sense than shipping jobs overseas, more sense than across-the-board corporate tax cuts, and more sense than rewarding already profitable corporations.
When will the government implement this practical, affordable, hiring credit to kickstart job creation and get our economy moving again? Why will it not do this?
Employment
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Saint Boniface
Manitoba
Conservative
Shelly Glover Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, I am so glad to hear NDP members talk about a hiring credit, because in fact, that is coming in the next phase of Canada's economic action plan.
We recognize the vital role of small businesses, and that is important, because they play a very important role in the economy and job creation. That is why we have lowered their tax bill in many ways. We reduced the small business tax rate from 12% to 11%, but the NDP voted against it. We increased the amount of income eligible for the lower small business tax rate from $300,000 to $500,000, and the--
Employment
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Conservative
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
NDP
Tarik Brahmi Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, according to a release by Canadian Press, the defence minister was kept out of key decisions about Canada's role in the Afghan war.
This was a top defence priority, yet the Prime Minister was calling all the shots. The Prime Minister could have used some advice. Most agree our efforts should have focused more on peace talks and diplomacy.
Is Prime Minister still making foreign policy and defence decisions on his own, or does he now let his cabinet in the room?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, we have always worked closely with the Prime Minister and with cabinet.
However, it is interesting to hear the hon. member talk about somehow reaching out to the Taliban or improving coordination inside Afghanistan. Even the Afghanistan government and the president himself have said that as a result of the assassination of Rabbani, it is back to business as usual. This unfortunately belays the fact that we cannot work with a terrorist organization that does not respect human rights, that does not respect women and that refuses to disarm.
I will take no advice from the member opposite.
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
NDP
Tarik Brahmi Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister's Office wants to control public opinion so much that it kept even the Minister of National Defence in the dark about the mission in Afghanistan. However, Canadians wanted a different approach. They wanted an approach like the one proposed by the NDP. This government only cares about its own interests, which are not those of the Canadian people.
Conservative ministers do not even know what is going on in their own departments. So how can Canadians expect any transparency from this government?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, once again, that is false.
I am very proud of the efforts the Canadian Forces have put forward in Afghanistan in conjunction with our other government departments. CIDA and the Department of Foreign Affairs have created an environment where there are now seven million Afghan children going to school. We are immunizing children. We are working with all of our international partners and the Afghanistan government. However, the New Democratic Party opposite has consistently voted against those efforts.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
NDP
Matthew Kellway Beaches—East York, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Department of National Defence continues to spring leaks about the minister's misuse of DND assets. By now we have all heard that the minister takes government jets like most Canadians take the bus. Now we find out that the Prime Minister personally kept the Minister of National Defence out of the loop on the Afghan war.
Why is the Prime Minister defending a minister that he himself has so little confidence in?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, as I and the Prime Minister have said, we use government assets for government business. That is exactly what has happened.
With respect to Afghanistan, we have made a magnificent effort on behalf of Canadians. They can be very proud of the work our men and women in uniform and our professional public servants have put forth in Afghanistan. As a government we have supported them. We have given them the resources. Unfortunately, the member's party opposite cannot say the same thing.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
NDP
Matthew Kellway Beaches—East York, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives' use of the repatriation of fallen Canadian soldiers to cover the Minister of National Defence's abuse of government jets is appalling. Using fallen military men and women for political damage control tarnishes their sacrifice. It is an insult to the families of those soldiers.
When will the minister take responsibility for his own decisions and stop using fallen soldiers as an excuse for his abuse of government jets?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member has it wrong. His feigned indignation once again brings shame to his party. In my four and one-half years as Minister of National Defence, I have made every effort to be at every repatriation of any fallen soldier, to be there to support the families and all the men and women in uniform who stand in harm's way on behalf of our country. I will continue to do that.
