Debates of Nov. 18th, 2011
House of Commons Hansard #49 of the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was farmers.
Topics
- Question Period
- Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act
- Medal of Bravery
- Battle of the Blades
- Public Safety
- Sir John A. Macdonald
- St. John's Lutheran Church
- Neuville Airport
- Rayne Dennis Schultz
- Medal of Bravery
- Child Poverty
- National Child Day
- Transgender Day of Remembrance
- National Flag of Canada
- Official Languages
- Coptic Christians
- Pay Equity
- Firearms Registry
- Justice
- Democracy
- Pension Plans
- Pay Equity
- Consumer Protection
- Natural Resources
- Government Expenditures
- National Defence
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Border Crossings
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Service Canada
- Poverty
- Aboriginal Affairs
- National Defence
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Democratic Reform
- Infrastructure
- Veterans
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Rail Transportation
- Justice
- Points of Order
- Government Response to Petitions
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act
- National Flag of Canada Act
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
Vancouver Island North
B.C.
Conservative
John Duncan Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development
Madam Speaker, today Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador and the Innu of Labrador are signing historic agreements to positively impact the future of the Innu nation and the Lower Churchill hydro development project. The new dawn agreements include the Innu land claim and self-government agreement in principle and the Lower Churchill Innu impact and benefits agreement.
I congratulate all of the leaders who have made this happen, including the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, and the former Labrador Innu leader who represents Canada today.
Rail Transportation
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
NDP
Randall Garrison Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, BC
Madam Speaker, let us talk about who is actually shutting down economic activity in my riding.
Let us talk about the rail service on Vancouver Island, which was guaranteed to British Columbia as part of Confederation. That rail service was shut down in April due to a lack of funding to repair the railbed. Now the bud cars that provided that service have actually been removed from Vancouver Island. That is not a good sign.
The owner of the track, the Island Corridor Foundation, is ready to go. The province, on June 28, provided a commitment to its share of the funding and is ready to go. All we are missing is action by the Conservative government.
Will the Conservative government now commit to providing its share, the $7.5 million that is needed to get this line running again or—
Rail Transportation
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
NDP
The Deputy Speaker Denise Savoie
Order, please. The hon. Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.
Rail Transportation
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean
Québec
Conservative
Denis Lebel Minister of Transport
Madam Speaker, as with all other important files, the owners of these businesses and organizations have a responsibility. And the owners usually assume that responsibility. Of course, we are aware of this file and we will continue to undertake the necessary analyses.
Justice
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
Bloc
André Bellavance Richmond—Arthabaska, QC
Madam Speaker, in his response to the Quebec justice minister on Bill C-10, the Minister of Justice expressed all his contempt for Quebec's 40 years of rehabilitation expertise, particularly its expertise in the rehabilitation of young offenders. The minister wrote that it is important to work with its provincial partners but this appears to be a one-way partnership—my way or no way.
Will the Minister of Justice put aside his ideological obsession and respect the will of Quebec by incorporating Quebec's required amendments into the bill, namely those pertaining to the long-term protection of the public and the rehabilitation and social reintegration of young offenders?
Justice
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
Delta—Richmond East
B.C.
Conservative
Kerry-Lynne Findlay Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice
Madam Speaker, we are always happy to work with our provincial counterparts. The principles of rehabilitation and reintegration, which have been so successful in Quebec, will continue to serve as the basis for Canada's youth justice system.
We have responded to Quebec's concerns with a series of past amendments, as well as a new amendment that is tabled at the justice committee now.
We are taking a balanced approach. We are listening. It is time for the opposition to end its grandstanding, support victims and support our measures on Bill C-10.
Oral Questions
Points of Order
Oral Questions
12:05 p.m.
Liberal
Mauril Bélanger Ottawa—Vanier, ON
Madam Speaker, this might be an interesting one. Ministers or parliamentary secretaries who quote from a text have to table the text in the House. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade was quoting the text from his iPad.
Would he table the iPad in the House so we can get a look at it.
Oral Questions
Points of Order
Oral Questions
12:10 p.m.
South Shore—St. Margaret's
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Gerald Keddy Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade
Madam Speaker, it would be a bit incongruous to table the iPad, but I would certainly be happy to supply the page of text from which I was reading.
Oral Questions
Points of Order
Oral Questions
12:10 p.m.
NDP
The Deputy Speaker Denise Savoie
Before we begin routine proceedings, there was a point of order raised earlier this morning, and I would like to correct a statement I made about members in the House referring to the presence or absence of members at committee.
Having verified this practice, there is indeed a different standard used when referring to members attendance in committee, since in committee, as we know, attendance is recorded. There is a public record for those proceedings, whereas in the House there is not.
I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that my comments may have caused.
Government Response to Petitions
Routine Proceedings
November 18th, 2011 / 12:10 p.m.
Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(b) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to six petitions.
Republic of the Fiji Islands
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
12:10 p.m.
NDP
Don Davies Vancouver Kingsway, BC
Madam Speaker, I am very pleased to rise to present a petition signed by hundreds of people all across British Columbia, calling for the establishment of a high commission in the Republic of the Fiji Islands.
Many people from the Fijian community in Canada, which I would point out number over 100,000 strong, have pointed out that the lack of consular services in Fiji presents a lot of difficulties for them.
The petitioners note that Fiji is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. They state that that the lack of consular services in that country means the situation causes inordinate delay and efficient service for tourist, visa, business and immigration issues, both for Canadian and Fijian citizens. They also note that the United States, Australia, New Zealand, China and India all have embassies or high commissions in Fiji.
I want to point out the hard work of one of my constituents, Mr. Vince Sharma, who has collected thousands and thousands of signatures, calling on the government to establish this very important services for Fijians and for Canadians of Fijian descent who travel to Fiji on business and personal business very frequently. This would be of great assistance to them.
Assisted Suicide
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
Rick Norlock Northumberland—Quinte West, ON
Madam Speaker, my constituents, primarily in the Quinte West area, make note that the Canadian Medical Association opposes assisted suicide and euthanasia and calls for suicide provincial programs to strengthen where necessary and urges its members to educate themselves and uphold the principles of palliative care.
The petitioners also wish that Parliament would retain section 241 of the Criminal Code, without changes, in order that Parliament not sanction or allow the counselling, aiding or abetting of suicide, whether by personal action or the Internet.
Service Canada
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
12:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Simms Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor, NL
Madam Speaker, once again, this is on behalf of many residents in the area of my riding known as Bonavista North, who had a unique relationship with Service Canada over the past five years at least.
The relationship was such that a community partnership developed between the Service Canada office in Gander. If one travelled about two hours away to Bonavista North, the local community had an office set up for people who wanted to get help with their Canada pension plan, their employment insurance and any other government service.
The problem is the government has now ended that partnership. Twice per month someone from Service Canada goes to that area. If people do not have computers or they are seniors who are not phone savvy, this becomes very problematic because many individuals appreciate the face-to-face contact they had at that office.
This petition is from many people in the Bonavista North area who want to restore that partnership.
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
12:15 p.m.
Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Madam Speaker, Question No. 173 will be answered today.
Question No. 173
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
12:15 p.m.
Bloc
Jean-François Fortin Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
With regard to the mitigation measures announced by the Prime Minister on June 6 for disaster victims in riparian areas in the Gaspé and Montérégie: (a) what is the exact description of these measures; (b) which government department or agency will be responsible for these measures; (c) who will these measures be directed at; (d) what criteria will be used in implementing these measures; (e) what amount does the government expect to spend on these measures; (f) on what date will these measures be accessible; (g) has the government discussed these measures with the Government of Quebec; and (h) how does the government intend to coordinate its efforts with those of the Government of Quebec?
