House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • Her favourite word was children.

Last in Parliament April 1997, as Liberal MP for Nepean (Ontario)

Won her last election, in 1993, with 60% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Employment Equity Act October 16th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to address Bill C-64.

While listening in the House today I worry that some of the members opposite have not really understood the vision for Canada or the intent of the bill.

I have followed with great interest the developments in employment equity over the years and it is my contention that employment equity is a fundamental building block for creating a better Canada.

Bill C-64 went before the Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Disabled Persons. This committee heard from a very broad section of witnesses and in its report endorsed the new features of Bill C-64 and recommended additional amendments. The act covers all federally regulated companies with 100 or more employees. Bill C-64 will bring the federal public service, its departments, agencies, boards and commissions, into line with standards already set for federally regulated corporations.

The changes Liberals will implement to strengthen the Employment Equity Act include the federal public service and federal agencies and commission under the Employment Equity Act. We will also give the Canadian Human Rights Commission the legislative authority to initiate investigations of employment equity issues.

Efforts to eradicate discrimination in the workplace and in hiring practices have been underway at the federal level since the enactment of the 1970s human rights legislation. In 1993 it became evident to the Liberal government of the day that voluntary measures toward achieving equity in the workplace were failing to bring about significant changes for women, aboriginal peoples, visible minorities and persons with disabilities. That is the key because they tried to achieve it through voluntary measures and it did not work.

On December 12, 1994 the human resources minister tabled in the House Bill C-64. He stated: "This initiative is a significant step toward ensuring equitable employment opportunities for women, aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities".

Most of us come into the House with a prepared speech, but sitting in my office and watching the TV monitor I heard so many nefarious statements from across the floor that I am going away from my prepared notes to address some of the things that were said. One that concerned me was with regard to quotas.

The bill is not about quotas. They kept referring to the charter of rights and freedoms and quoting it. The bill is certainly not in conflict with what is being said in the charter of rights and freedoms.

The merit principle in the bill should be and is the sole basis of hiring. I think anyone who sees anything different within the bill is really not understanding what is being said.

I refer to the member from Beaver River, who went on at great length saying she is a woman in the House and she came here because she is competitive and because of competence. I do not argue that point at all. I would like to think I got here that way as well.

One works hard, does as one has to do, does the same as anybody else running for public office and gets elected. What about all the people who want to run for public office who are just as competent as I am? Maybe this is what the feminist movement is all about, I do not know. Is it not my responsibility to assist if I see someone who would make a wonderful member of the House of Commons? If that person is competent, has the merit and a reason to be here and yet does not have the confidence to project himself or herself on the floor of the House of Commons, does that person not deserve some assistance from someone? I say they do. I am using this in simplistic language to point out not everybody has the competence to get into the House of Commons.

Getting back to strong women, I want to relate a story in my life before I became an elected official. I was an elected official for 10 years before I came to the House of Commons. Working in an administrative capacity I applied for a position within my organization. I did not get the position. The human resources person said to me: "You are more qualified than the person who is getting the job. You have longer service than the person who is getting the job but we must give it to him because he has a wife and two children".

I had a husband and five children and I could not understand the reason the job was being given to him over me. There was no valid reason why he should get the job. Let us consider a visible minority. In that same organization I was asked by the human resources director to short list the people who were applying for jobs in the department I was in. I gave my list of three people. One was a Jamaican woman. The director's comment to me was: "I am not sure whether our organization is ready for a black woman". That is why we need to offer our assistance and our support for this.

That was not too long ago. I have not been here forever. We have come a long way. We have all had examples in our lives of being held down or held back for the wrong reasons.

Somebody from the other side of the House had said that white young males will rise up in anger. My goodness, white young women or black young women or whomever should have been rising up in anger for years and years and never did until now. It is about time they did.

I sat on the committee on human rights and the status of disabled persons. We heard from people with disabilities about how their rights are constantly being violated. I will tell a little story about a Saskatchewan farmer.

This farmer had lost both his arms in a farming accident. He had prostheses from the elbows down on both arms. He relied on his son and his wife to help with the farming. When he appeared before the committee he said: "When I buy a huge harvesting machine I have to pay about $60,000 more for this machine than what my able

bodied neighbour has to pay because I need to have equipment that my two prostheses can handle". Is that fair?

That man was in business and he was being discriminated against through the cost of the machine because he had two artificial arms. That man needs our help. We should offer him our help. I love telling all these little stories but I sure have strayed away from my speech.

Canada today is a very different society than it was 50 or even 20 years ago. Today we as women want and need to look after ourselves financially. At the same time we want to know those who cannot are being treated equally. Our aboriginal peoples are demanding self-determination and persons with disabilities want to be fully integrated throughout society. New Canadians want to fully participate in all aspects of Canadian society.

Canada is a changed society, one where these four groups are expressing specific needs that must be addressed. It is a society that requires the contribution of all our citizens and this piece of legislation addresses this changed society.

It is through employment equity that we will ensure that the skills and abilities of all Canadians will be fully utilized. It is through employment equity that we will one day eliminate the social and economic costs of marginalizing big numbers of Canadians. By ensuring that these four groups take their rightful place in the Canadian labour force, a more vibrant and productive society will emerge.

This bill will lead us toward a fair and just society by making us examine our assumptions of what is the right way to do business. It will make us question hiring procedures that have in the past always found qualified individuals for the job. I will give you an example of where it does not always work.

It will lead us there by teaching us through awareness training to feel what it is like to be excluded from the workplace simply because your disability stops you from getting up the stairs to the work site.

It will lead us there by encouraging us to make accommodations for mothers and fathers who take the needed time from work to look after their youngsters. It will lead us there by teaching us that those people whom we thought would be difficult to manage are many of our most valuable employees.

For this reason I encourage all members of the House to vote with a resounding yes for this legislation, a resounding yes to a better nation.

Petitions October 4th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, the third petition has 34 signatories who call upon Parliament to redesign, restructure, reorganize or replace ineffective government structures and systems if needed in order to address the poor state of our national economic, social and environmental health in a timely and cost efficient manner.

Petitions October 4th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, the second petition is from 220 signatories from Ontario and Quebec. They request that Parliament legislate a more effective, productive and cost efficient method of unemployment relief, a policy of paying from these funds three million people $1,200 per year to work at entry level positions in understaffed public and private institutions.

Petitions October 4th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, I have three separate petitions to present today.

The first is from 57 petitioners who request that Parliament institute complete recycling, waste reduction, energy and resource conservation, clean up and zero pollution programs.

Member For Nepean June 14th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, I wish you would have waited until I had finished my statement before you did that. It makes it more difficult for me.

I would like to publicly thank the members of the House and the constituency of Nepean for the many kindnesses shown to me these past few months during my surgery and illness. I have been overwhelmed with letters, phone calls, flowers and gifts, personal testimonies, prayers, love and good wishes. I have quickly come to realize how important it is to have friends like I have. For this I thank you.

I must also thank the surgical team headed by Dr. Rolando Del Maestro of Victoria Hospital in London, Ontario. I am so grateful that the professionalism of his team has allowed me to quickly return to this House.

Ceso International Services December 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I offer congratulations to volunteers with CESO International Services who give of their time both here at home and abroad.

In particular, I would like to mention two Nepean people. Mr. Jerry Szymanowski travelled to the Slovak Republic to advise manufacturers of insulation material on exports to Canadian

markets. He also laid the groundwork for a joint venture partnership with a Canadian firm.

Second, Aleksandrs Sprudz. Alex came to Canada from Latvia in 1951. He spent 18 years with Indian and northern affairs helping establish agriculture co-operatives in Indian and Inuit communities.

He recently returned to his homeland to share his knowledge and experience in his field with researchers and professors from Latvian universities. He was instrumental in working with members of the Latvian congress of agronomists to put forward a resolution to the Latvian government for approval of lands to be set aside for the sole purpose of agricultural co-operatives.

Aleksandrs Sprudz passed away on December 6, 1994. I wish to extend my heartfelt sympathy to his wife and daughter.

Petitions December 13th, 1994

Madam Speaker, I have a second petition with 45 signatures.

The petitioners are calling upon Parliament not to amend the human rights code, the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in any way that would tend to indicate societal approval of same sex relationships or of homosexuality, including amending the human rights code to include in the prohibited grounds of discrimination the undefined phrase sexual orientation.

Petitions December 13th, 1994

Madam Speaker, I have petitions signed by 800 people from across the country.

These people believe that grandparents, as a consequence of the death, separation or divorce of their children, are often denied access to their grandchildren by their guardians. Several provincial jurisdictions including the Quebec civil code contain a provision to ensure the right of access of grandparents to their grandchildren.

The petitioners request that Parliament amend the Divorce Act to state that in no case may a father or mother, without serious cause, place obstacles between the child and the grandparents and failing agreement between the parties the modalities of the relations are settled by the court.

Petitions December 9th, 1994

The third petition has 57 signatures and is presented by Mr. Norman of Nepean. It is on assisted suicide.

It asks that Parliament ensure that the present provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada prohibiting assisted suicide be enforced vigorously and that Parliament make no changes in the law that would sanction or allow the aiding or abetting of suicide or active or passive euthanasia.

Petitions December 9th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the second petition is from 33 petitioners. It is with regard to spouses at home and is in response to the private member's bill of my colleague from Mississauga South which asks that we compensate spouses working in the home and caring for preschool children.