Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 79996-80010 of 139482
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Bill C-11 committee  Yes. Bill C-11 would allow us to remove the DRM. The issue that I raise is that I suspect it will be difficult to find access to those tools. It's not clear that the tools will be accessible, so I believe it will be a right that can't easily be exercised by the average blind

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Marc Workman

Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act  Madam Speaker, I am disappointed at that kind of rhetoric. We are talking about something that is important to the lives of Canadians, their jobs and their ability to support their families. I think my debate has been clear. It is as though the Conservative government is like

February 27th, 2012House debate

Joyce MurrayLiberal

Agriculture committee  I think we've been pretty clear. We think the problem lies within supply management.

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Justin Taylor

Fisheries committee  Just to be clear for committee members, the amendment has been defeated.

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Fisheries committee  We're now debating a subamendment: “and that this motion be reported to the House”, just to be clear for committee members. Mr. Donnelly, please go ahead.

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Bill C-11 committee   the technological protection measure. It's not clear exactly what it would mean to not unduly impair a TPM, and the ambiguity concerns us. Given the general restrictions on circumventing TPMs, we believe it's unlikely that the necessary tools will be widely available and readily accessible

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Marc Workman

Fisheries committee  . Cleary to be among us so that he would have a chance to weigh in on this and clarify his position. He hasn't been here, so we've had to have this debate without him. We think it's important for the parties in Parliament to be clear on where they stand. His comments raised some doubt

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Randy KampConservative

Fisheries committee  To be clear, Mr. Kamp, you're seeking to amend the motion by only adding the words “and that this motion be reported to the House”?

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Fisheries committee  I just want to be clear on the amendment.

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act  Madam Speaker, I want to thank the hon. member for his remarks. The blunt statements we are getting from the government and the representatives from the Liberal Party are truly deplorable. In Quebec—and my colleagues can attest to this—on May 2, we were sent a very clear message

February 27th, 2012House debate

Raymond CôtéNDP

Government Operations committee  Thank you very much. So there is a whole lot of clearing out to be done. The templates and the reference frameworks need to be standardized so that the data presented can be compared. You also briefly mentioned the idea of open government and the extent to which online tools

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Denis BlanchetteNDP

Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act  Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for her question. This is a very good time to talk about what would make it possible for the New Democratic Party to support free trade agreements. I talked about the investor protection clauses, which are utter nonsense. Let me be clear

February 27th, 2012House debate

Raymond CôtéNDP

Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act  Madam Speaker, New Democrats have been clear that they intend to vote against this bill. I want to address the issue of international trade. All the provinces rely heavily on exports. Exportation contributes immensely to the Canadian economy and creates thousands of jobs

February 27th, 2012House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Government Operations committee  Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting that we not change just because we've done it that way. In terms of technology, we're not talking about simply putting the blue book online. We're talking about arranging the data in such a way that people can go at it from as many different

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Joe Jordan

Bill C-11 committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Gannon or Mr. de Beer, you both mentioned the Swiss model, but I'm not quite clear on what the Swiss model is or what we are talking about. I think you may have mentioned levies, Mr. Gannon. Are you able to expand a little further on what the Swiss

February 27th, 2012Committee meeting

Paul CalandraConservative