Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 215891
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Privilege   the deliberations on an NDP opposition day motion considered on March 18. The matter raised by the member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes concerns a potential breach of privilege concerning witness testimony at a Standing Committee on Government Operations in its study

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Mark GerretsenLiberal

Privilege  The second matter relates to the deliberation on the NDP opposition day motion that took place on Monday, March 18. The member for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier alleges that his privileges were breached when the government House leader moved an amendment to the motion during

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Mark GerretsenLiberal

Privilege   to the members, acquainted myself with the content of the report and consulted the few but clear precedents, the Chair finds the matter to be a prima facie question of privilege. In his intervention, the parliamentary secretary to the leader of the government raised concerns about the motion

March 22nd, 2024House debate

The SpeakerLiberal

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 37th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts in relation to the motion adopted on Wednesday, March 6, 2024, regarding “Report 1: ArriveCan” of the 2024 reports of the Auditor General of Canada

March 22nd, 2024House debate

John WilliamsonConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak to this debate on this question of privilege and the motion that has been put forward by the member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes. I want to thank him for bringing this forward. I would agree that this is an extremely

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Mark GerretsenLiberal

Privilege  ) providing responses to the questions referred to in the 17th Report; and (c) responding to supplementary questions arising from his responses to the questions referred to in the 17th Report. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to have the opportunity to rise to speak to this important motion

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Business of Supply   will read the motion to clearly indicate what we are calling for today and what the vote will be about. That the House declare non-confidence in the Prime Minister and his costly government for increasing the carbon tax 23 % on April 1, as part of his plan to quadruple the tax while

March 21st, 2024House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

Business of Supply  , such as budgets and throne speeches, at almost every opportunity over the past few years. Today the Conservatives are calling for a confidence vote, but they did not just move a motion calling on Parliament to declare non-confidence in the government. The motion does not say simply

March 21st, 2024House debate

Simon-Pierre Savard-TremblayBloc

Business of Supply   of people way over on the other side of the country, in British Columbia. I want to thank him for that. I think it is worth taking a few moments today to point out that we are here to debate a motion of non-confidence. What does that mean? Simply put, if the government does not win

March 21st, 2024House debate

Luc BertholdConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I would like you to stick to the normal rotation when it comes to the speaking time of the three other parties after the motion is presented. I would ask you to continue that tradition. Obviously, the NDP fully supports this motion, particularly when it comes

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Business of Supply   had a day's respite. Since they had a day to talk about something else, we can see that they are beginning to diversify their intellectual assets and issues to debate. I would like to thank them. Obviously, today we are debating a motion that is unacceptable, because

March 21st, 2024House debate

Jean-Denis GaronBloc

Softwood Lumber  All those opposed to the hon. minister moving the motion will please say nay. It is agreed. The House has heard the terms of the motion. All those opposed to the motion will please say nay. (Motion agreed to)

March 21st, 2024House debate

The SpeakerLiberal

Privilege   of his answers was in question, the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates adopted a motion to raise the question of privilege. Obviously, the Bloc Québécois supported that question of privilege. We were at committee, we asked Mr. Firth questions, and we saw

March 22nd, 2024House debate

Nathalie Sinclair-DesgagnéBloc

Privilege   a Conservative motion to present a report to the House, “outlining the potential breach of privilege concerning Kristian Firth’s refusal to answer those questions which the Committee agreed to put to him and his prevarication in answering others.” The area of greatest concern that I want

March 20th, 2024House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Privilege   in previous incidents the fact that parliamentary committees insist on having their rights respected. However, the committee was insistent, and we had a motion that came to the House that was concurred in unanimously. It ordered Mr. Firth and Mr. Anthony to appear; this meant

March 21st, 2024House debate

Garnett GenuisConservative