Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Foreign Affairs committee Thank you very much. Thanks for having me here today.
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee No, my intention here was to improve a situation. I think I've done that. Some may view it as not being perfect, but again, I don't think there are many of us who are perfect. I do think it's as close to perfect as we can get, and all I can do is say that I hope I get the commit
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Well, I would respectfully disagree with you on that.
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Yes. I think by the federal government trying to bring in legislation, as you said, to compensate or cover the provincial jurisdiction, that's sending a message to the provinces that we don't trust them to make a decision. To Mr. Julian's earlier comments about British Columbia
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Mr. Julian, I'm glad your persistence hasn't changed since our days on the international trade committee. You're a dog with a bone. I think that Mr. Dechert spelled it out quite clearly. Basically, in my opinion, there is no loophole that you're referring to. It comes in there,
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee I'll be very brief. Yes, the diversion at Chicago that you referred to isn't going to change. Let's call it grandfathering it in or whatever. It's there, but it will stop any new diversions similar to that. You mentioned the pipeline that goes to London, and I'm quite aware of
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee With all due respect, I actually did respond to that. I'll do it again, Mr. Julian. If that proposal, as Mr. Tilson stated, was to be proposed by the proponents of this quarry, it would come under those provincial jurisdictions. The water being taken would not be coming out of t
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee I'm going to respectfully disagree a little bit, Mr. Tilson, on the part that it comes under the realm of this bill, and I'll try and explain why. When and if this quarry application goes forward, if at some point they're removing groundwater--which I hear they are--they will ha
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee If this were under federal jurisdiction, I believe—
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Okay, first of all, as I was going to—
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee My comment to that is, if this application were to load train cars, say out of Georgian Bay, as Mr. Tilson said, I believe the bill would cover that off. I strongly believe that. I just believe that it does as far as the provincial part of it. You referred to your home province
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Okay, I'll stop there.
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee No, again, I think you're missing the key point here, Mr. Julian. This is not out of federal jurisdiction waters or waters that are under federal jurisdiction.
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee I don't believe so, with all due respect.
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller
Foreign Affairs committee Could I just respond to that, Mr. Julian?
October 25th, 2012Committee meeting
Larry Miller