I thought it was within the first one, but you are right. We need an amendment.
Mr. Perron is therefore moving an amendment to include Standing Order 109 in the original motion.
Are there any questions? Are we in favour of adding Standing Order 109 to the original motion?
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Then we have the second amendment, moved by Francis Drouin, which reads, “to do a gap analysis, identify improvements” and then continuing on with the lines.