Evidence of meeting #26 for Agriculture and Agri-Food in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was c-206.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jonothan Hodson  Director, Grain Growers of Canada
Frank Annau  Director, Environment and Science Policy, Canadian Federation of Agriculture
Erin Gowriluk  Executive Director, Grain Growers of Canada
Bob Lowe  President, Canadian Cattlemen's Association
Marc-André Viau  Director, Government Relations, Équiterre
Émile Boisseau-Bouvier  Analyst, Climate Policy and Ecological Transition, Équiterre
Karen Ross  Director, Farmers for Climate Solutions
Fawn Jackson  Director, Policy and International Relations, Canadian Cattlemen's Association

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Mr. Hodson, at the bottom where it says “interpretation”, you just have to select the proper one. I don't know if you have that on your computer.

4:25 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

I select “English”, then, and it will interpret for me?

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Yes.

4:25 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

Okay. I just did that. My apologies.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Lyne Bessette Liberal Brome—Missisquoi, QC

Okay.

Should I try again in French or did you get the question?

4:25 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

Sure. If you would like to, go ahead.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Lyne Bessette Liberal Brome—Missisquoi, QC

You mentioned that there's no other option but natural gas and propane for drying grain. Can you explain why those are the only forms of energy that can be used, and, if that's the case, is it due to a temporary lack of innovation?

4:25 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

My only option is propane at this point. I don't have a natural gas option. It's very limited where that option exists on farms. My only option is propane, which can be delivered to my operation.

It comes down strictly to economics. Mr. Chair mentioned his boiler. There are a lot of ideas on a small scale, but to get large enough to be economical on a modern grain farm, the cost of any technology is still prohibitive. The options are just cost prohibitive.

April 20th, 2021 / 4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Lyne Bessette Liberal Brome—Missisquoi, QC

Thank you.

My question is for Mr. Annau.

You said you'd also like to see the exemption expanded to include activities such as heating, livestock pens and irrigation. As my colleague Mr. Drouin said, that change may be beyond the scope of Bill C-206, but I nevertheless wanted to ask you whether greener options exist for heating and irrigation.

4:25 p.m.

Director, Environment and Science Policy, Canadian Federation of Agriculture

Frank Annau

Much as was actually just addressed by Mr. Hodson, there are currently a number of innovations under way to basically reduce emissions from the fuel we use, particularly for applications like irrigation.

At this point, in terms of making the innovations scalable and economical for application on farms, we aren't quite there yet. Obviously, this makes us appreciate injections of innovation funding [Technical difficulty—Editor] into these certain fields. At this point, the barrier to having these adopted on a wider scale is economics right off the bat.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Thank you, Mrs. Bessette and Mr. Annau.

Now it's Mr. Perron's term.

Go ahead for the next two minutes.

4:25 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Overbeek, I'd like you to continue with what you were telling Mr. Lehoux about biomass before you ran out of time. You ruled out agricultural residues in order to preserve your soils, which was definitely a good decision, but you mentioned forest biomass. Have you had a chance to explore that avenue?

4:25 p.m.

Christian Overbeek

We're a group of farmers, and, as an organization, we considered the possibility of using forest biomass. You have to understand that any additional demand for forest biomass may result in a shortage. In addition, the main challenge in using that technology to dry grain is the very short period of time in the fall when that equipment is used to dry and condition our grain, which makes it non-cost-effective compared to a heating system that can operate 8 to 12 months a year for other types of crops and uses.

4:25 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

We keep coming back to the same problem: the period of use, which undermines cost-effectiveness.

Mr. Hodson, in your presentation, you referred to crop rotation, which you do in order to preserve your soils and protect the environment, which would be jeopardized if you couldn't dry your grain any more. Please tell us more about that.

4:25 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

The way I was looking at it, it's like a negative consequence. One of the things we're cognizant of in agriculture in Canada is crop rotation and its benefits for our soil health, disease prevention and so on. On a personal level, on our farm, I am concerned that down the road, if this cost escalates in the way that it is being forecast and things are left as they are, I may lose the option of having one more crop in my rotation. I find that troubling.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

You have 10 seconds left.

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

Okay.

If Bill C-206 doesn't pass, how will that prevent you from rotating your crops? You'll stop growing certain crops because they won't be cost-effective and will be used solely for rotation purposes. Is that correct?

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Please be brief.

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

Yes. There are only three seconds left.

We were slowed down because of an interpretation problem.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Yes. I'll give you a little more time.

You have the floor.

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

You're very kind.

4:30 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

I will never stop trying to do crop rotation. It's just a matter of having to fill one to fill the void. I've done that for the crops I have now. Farmers will never stop innovating, but I would hope that we're allowed to do that and not be forced into having to make changes. That's what part of this is about.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Pat Finnigan

Thank you, Mr. Hodson.

Thank you, Mr. Perron.

Go ahead, Mr. MacGregor, for two and a half minutes.

4:30 p.m.

NDP

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

Thank you, Chair.

I'll go back to a comparison between Bill C-206 and what was announced in the budget yesterday. The Department of Finance is estimating $100 million in the first year, and then it goes on to say that returns in future years will be based on proceeds from the price of pollution. It says that the intention is to return a portion of the proceeds. I know policy like this doesn't just occur in a vacuum.

In the lead-up to the budget, did the government, specifically the Department of Finance, ever have any consultations with you?

This is to all of the witnesses. I'll start with the Grain Growers. Did it ever have any consultation with you on developing this policy?

Did it give you any idea as to what the portion of the proceeds would be?

4:30 p.m.

Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Jonothan Hodson

I will pass this question on to Erin Gowriluk here.