If I may, I'll answer that, because that actually brings up the point that I didn't get to in my notes.
There's a very simple solution, I think, to a lot of this, if it just could be agreed to on a coast-to-coast basis. I did speak to most of the other chiefs of protocol about this. We have talked about this. It's simply a pecking order.
The national order of precedence is a document that is quite encompassing, but when it comes to announcements, new releases, and this type of thing, this is what most, but not all, the chiefs of protocol—I don't want to speak for anybody else, but I have polled many of them—would like to suggest: prime minister first, premier next, federal minister next, followed by provincial minister, and then member of Parliament, MLA, or member of the National Assembly, however they're referred to.
If you adopted a simple process like that, then that's always respecting the federal order first, but it has to be the actual person who is there. If you're there representing the prime minister, that doesn't mean you get the spot of the prime minister. If that were adopted, I think you would be saving staff time all over the country, and quite a lot of angst, really. That's what I wanted to say.