I'm going to make a ruling before we start discussion, because it is actually inadmissible. It's similar to what we had last week.
I'll say it again:
...an amendment is inadmissible if it proposes to amend a statute that is not before the committee or a section of the parent Act, unless the latter is specifically amended by a clause of the bill.
We do not have that clause in front of us, so I'm going to rule that inadmissible.
Next up is amendment NDP-3.
Mr. Stetski.