Evidence of meeting #113 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was know.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jeff Silvester  Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Nathaniel Erskine-Smith

Thank you, Mr. Silvester.

First, I want to impress upon you the disappointment of this committee at the failure of Mr. Massingham to attend. I encourage you to impress upon your colleague the significance of this, and that we are going to have a conversation as a committee about how to proceed, and we're going to discuss the potential of moving forward with a finding of contempt. I would encourage your colleague to attend before us, and to come forward with dates that he could make himself available.

11:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

We provided the information why he couldn't attend to your clerk.

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Nathaniel Erskine-Smith

Well, it was very limited information. Look, I have a lot of friends who are lawyers.

11:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

That's fine. As that process unfolds, we're happy to participate.

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Nathaniel Erskine-Smith

You have clearly lawyered up, and frankly, the information you provided isn't adequate.

I just have one last question before we move in camera. Do you think that Ripon was used for multiple SCL clients? I know it was used for the Cruz campaign in the primary. Who else was it used for?

11:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

During the 2014 mid-terms there were a number of clients that it was used for. Bolton was one you brought up. I can get you the list. Off the top of my head, I don't have—

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Nathaniel Erskine-Smith

If you could get us the list to us, that would be very useful.

After you were involved with SCL, Ripon stayed in SCL's hands. Is that correct?

11:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

After the work we did, we did transfer the code to them. There is a version of the code that we last provided to them in our repository, but we have not used it. We did transfer the code to them after we were done, yes.

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Nathaniel Erskine-Smith

You suggested today that it's likely, based on the information we now know, that the improperly obtained Facebook information is what was backing up SCL's psychographic profiling in Ripon.

It was used by Cruz. It was used by Bolton, and thereafter it was in SCL's hands. We know that Bannon played a role. We know that Mercer played a role. Plausibly, it was used in the Trump campaign as well, but I know that is after your time and that you can't speak to it.

With that, I thank you, Mr. Silvester.

We will now move in camera.

[Proceedings continue in camera]