So court sealings almost never happen and there's a very high wire for court sealings. In a regular civil or criminal suit.... I'll read. This is Richard Leblanc from York and Harvard universities:
Naming of the institution would cause media scrutiny, but the procedural rights of the bank would remain intact. If a person or firm is charged civilly or criminally, the name of the person or firm is almost always disclosed, as a matter of public interest and transparency, at the time the person or firm is charged, not after the sentence or appeal rights have been exhausted.
Why would we treat banks differently in the FINTRAC regime?