Evidence of meeting #86 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was friend.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Mary Dawson  As an Individual

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes, but that makes no sense, does it?

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

No. I'm recommending that they get rid of that distinction.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes, let's do that.

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

Even if the distinction is gotten rid of, if you own 100% of your assets in one entity and you put it in a blind trust, what do you suppose is in your blind trust? You know.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes. You'd be pretty stupid not to figure that out.

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

You need additional measures. The act has the powers in sections 29 and 30 to establish those, and that's what our office has done.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Thank you. That's helpful.

As the committee pursues strengthening the act, I hope, because it needs some strengthening, anything that has 70, 80, or 89 recommendations from the watchdog sounds to me like an act that could use some—

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

Some of them are tiddly little things, but some of them are really important.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes, not all are equivalent, but just the sheer number should strike most Canadians. Canadians are going to look back at this and ask, “Are the rules sufficient right now, in 2018, to keep ethical behaviour as the norm?”

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

But you know, they're not bad. The fact of the matter is that compared to the rest of the world, we're pretty good. Also, the other thing is that people are pretty good generally. This stuff can get blown out of proportion. Generally, people want to do the right thing.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Sure, but the reason we have rules is that when people do the wrong thing intentionally—

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

We need the rules. We need the rules, of course.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes, and we need watchdogs, not for the good people doing the good things—

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

We need the watchdogs and the rules for people—even the good ones—when they're doing the wrong things.

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

Actually, we need them for everybody so that they know what the rules are.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Yes.

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

Yes, and some people will say, “Look, I know I'm good, so I don't need to worry about these rules.”

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

No, you can't legislate out stupid. We've tried.

I want to know about when the Prime Minister or the Prime Minister's Office saw the findings, because you said they didn't see the conclusions until you reported this. Is that right?

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

That's right.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

When were the findings seen? I'm looking through the findings. They're all pointing in one direction. When were the findings shown to the Prime Minister's office?

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

When I showed the facts.... Sorry; what do you mean by “findings”?

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Well, you said this earlier—

12:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Mary Dawson

I don't know what that term means.

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Oh, excuse me.