Evidence of meeting #62 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was work.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Karen Swol  Director, Program Management, Rail Safety, Department of Transport
Dean Beyea  Director, International Trade Policy Division, Department of Finance
Olivier Nicoloff  Director, Democracy, Commonwealth and Francophonie Division, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Colleen Barnes  Executive Director, Domestic Policy Directorate, Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Nancy Leigh  Manager, Governance Secretariat, Canada School of Public Service
Jane Pearse  Director, Financial Institutions Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Suzanne Brisebois  Director General, Policy and Operations, Parole Board of Canada, Public Safety Canada
Louise Laflamme  Chief, Marine Policy and Regulatory Affairs, Department of Transport
Lenore Duff  Senior Director, Strategic Policy and Legislative Reform, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Lawrence Hanson  Director General, Strategic Policy Directorate, Department of the Environment
Pamela Miller  Director General, Telecommunications Policy Branch, Department of Industry
Allan MacGillivray  Special Advisor to the Director General, Telecommunications Policy, Department of Industry
Alwyn Child  Director General, Program Development and Guidance Directorate, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Mireille Laroche  Director General, Employment Insurance Policy, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Mark Hodgson  Senior Policy Analyst, Labour Markets, Employment and Learning, Department of Finance
Patrick Halley  Chief, Tariffs and Market Acess, International Trade and Finance, Department of Finance
Vivian Krause  As an Individual
Mark Blumberg  Lawyer and Partner, Blumberg Segal LLP
Dan Kelly  Senior Vice-President, Legislative Affairs, Canadian Federation of Independent Business
Dennis Howlett  Coordinator, Canadians for Tax Fairness
Jamie Ellerton  Executive Director, EthicalOil.org
Blair Rutter  Grain Growers of Canada
Marcel Lauzière  President and Chief Executive Officer, Imagine Canada
Tom King  Co-Chair, Finance and Taxation Committee, Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada
Sandra Harder  Director General, Strategic Policy and Planning, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Cam Carruthers  Director, Program Integrity Division, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
David Manicom  Immigration Program Manager (New Delhi), Area Director (South Asia), Department of Citizenship and Immigration

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

While you were working for UNICEF.

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

I was an employee of the United Nations. I also was a CIDA scholar and a scholar with IDRC, so Canadian taxpayers put me through graduate school actually.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

We have the Rockefeller Brothers Fund in the United States. We have the Pew Charitable Trusts. Each has over $3 billion in assets and contributes somewhere around $150 million per year to different endeavours.

The Rockefellers, of course, are the founders of Standard Oil, a huge oil company. The Pew Charitable Trusts is funded by Sun Oil. He was the founder of Sun Oil. I always thought it interesting that they would work against Canadian interests, which is exactly what they're doing in relation to their funding foundations in Canada. Is that correct?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

I guess that's one way of looking at it.

The way I look at it is that I think they're doing what they, as Americans, think is best for their country. Canadians, I think most of us, are doing what we think is best for our country. It just so happens that it's not the same.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Are you aware that the United States right now buys 99% of the oil that we produce in this country?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Yes, I am aware of that.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Are you also aware that they often buy that oil at up to a 40% discount?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Why is that? Why do the Americans get such a great discount? Is it because they're such great neighbours?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Well, I think we all know it's because they have us over a barrel. They have a monopoly on our oil.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

They have us over an oil barrel, I guess you could say.

What would happen if we put the Northern Gateway pipeline through to British Columbia?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

I think we all know. I think we'd get—what's the spread now—$20 or $30 a barrel. We're losing enormously. The Americans are getting our oil essentially at a discount, which is probably why they don't want our oil to go to China, because then they'd have to pay more for it.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

It's fair to say that right now they're getting 1.3 million barrels a day, which they expect to be about 4.2 million barrels a day within 12 years. That's a lot of money. I can't add it up in my head, but it's a lot of money. A 40% discount on that would be a substantial sum, would it not?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Yes, of course.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I had Tides Canada in my office some time ago. They told me that they had taken no position for or against the oil sands. Can you comment on that?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

It doesn't ring true for me. I have a blog and posted their information showing half of their budget went to some 20 or 30 groups on the north coast, all of which are opposed. I can't find one single organization that they fund that is in favour of the pipeline. They funded the Dogwood Initiative, which led the campaign for a federal ban on tanker traffic. They've taken off their website their advertising for the Pipe up Against Enbridge campaign. There are many examples, not to mention that they have received nearly $1 million from the Oak Foundation, and $2 million from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. The Hewlett Foundation is specifically funding a campaign to reduce fossil fuel development.

I don't know why Hewlett, Oak, and other foundations would be funding Tides Canada if it had no position on the oil sands. It just doesn't make sense.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I think a lot of it does make sense in relation to what they're doing. The Coastal First Nations turning point initiative and West Coast Environmental Law, what are their purposes?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

I don't speak for them.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Are you familiar with their work?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Somewhat, yes.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Can you tell us what you know of their work and what they're funding?

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Actually, I know more of what they've been given money for than I know of what they actually do. West Coast Environmental Law in particular was funded by the Oak Foundation specifically for work against Enbridge.

8:10 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Enbridge in relation to—

8:10 p.m.

As an Individual

Vivian Krause

Pardon me, against the Northern Gateway, yes.

8:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

One minute.