Thank you, Mr. Chair.
First of all, there are two things we must factor in, and this was a previous motion by Mr. McColeman with the deadline of the end of February. We have to keep in mind the study limitations and the meeting day limitations. That's the first thing.
The second thing is that at the subcommittee, as the chair just said, we went through the list that the clerk has received of those interested, and they were relatively the same types of organizations, so we didn't feel that the testimony would be that different.
In my opinion, we have heard from a variety of those who are affected. From those who have submitted their interest, it has already been established that it is repetitive in terms of the type of testimony that we would hear.
I think this is a good end point, and then on the 22nd, drafting our instructions so we can keep on time and move forward with tabling this report.