Evidence of meeting #85 for Finance in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was budget.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Trevor McGowan  Senior Legislative Chief, Legislative Review, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Pierre Mercille  Senior Legislative Chief, Sales Tax Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Gervais Coulombe  Acting Chief, Excise Policy, Sales Tax Division, Department of Finance
James Greene  Director, Business Income Tax Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Pierre LeBlanc  Director, Personal Income Tax Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Patrick Halley  Director, International Trade Policy Division, International Trade and Finance Branch, Department of Finance
Laura Bourns  Senior Economist, International Trade Policy Division, International Trade and Finance Branch, Department of Finance
Nicolas Moreau  Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
James Wu  Chief, Financial Institutions Analysis, Department of Finance

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Francesco Sorbara Liberal Vaughan—Woodbridge, ON

I think Germany has a AAA rating too.

6:15 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

I'm not done with my statement. I also said “with positive interest rates along the curve”, which is not the case in Germany right now because there are some sections of the interest curve that are still negative in Germany. But you're totally right that Germany also has a AAA rating.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Francesco Sorbara Liberal Vaughan—Woodbridge, ON

Yes, they do. I just wanted to make sure we have that on the record. We don't want to have anything improper there.

That's it, Sir. Thank you.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Mr. Dusseault.

6:15 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Moreau, thank you for being here and for giving us that presentation.

You said the government had to return to Parliament at least once every three years to seek parliamentary approval as regards the public debt. You said the requirement provided for accountability and greater transparency on the government's part.

Could you please explain how it is more transparent to inform Canadian taxpayers of the exact amount of borrowing—which stands at more than $1 trillion—when they don't necessarily see all the related details? How does that provide greater transparency?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

It will be more transparent in the sense that the public can now know the facts, since the facts will be reported at least once every three years.

Under our current system, only the marginal increase in the debt is reviewed each year. It may be slightly more difficult for Canadian taxpayers to understand the data than to review all the government's borrowing requirements over a maximum of three years.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Each year, Parliament is called upon to pass the budget, meaning the government's expense budget. It may be a hypothetical situation, but let's look at the following case. Parliament has passed the expense budget, but after three years, Parliament doesn't approve the bill tabled by the minister.

How can the budget limit be raised? Is it through a bill?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

The limit would be raised through the borrowing authority. Essentially, it would be a legislative process, so it should be tabled in Parliament.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

So, the amount would be increased directly under the legislation.

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Passing a bill is a complex process. We deal with it on a daily basis. The process takes time and it's left to the whims of the elected officials, who are called upon to vote on the issues.

Let's go back to the hypothetical case I gave you. Parliament passes the expense budget, in the form of appropriations, for one year. Have you considered that the budget proposed in the government's bill may be higher than the authorized limit? Could these types of disparities occur? Through this type of bill, could Parliament pass a budget that exceeds the authorized limit?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

If the government were to announce new appropriations or new budgetary expenditures that exceed the limit, it would need to request a new budget limit. To do so, it would need to go through the whole process. That's how the system allows for more transparency, as I said. If the government wants to spend more and the limit becomes restrictive, it will need to be transparent and ask Parliament to raise the limit.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

In terms of whether the limit is restrictive, I understand the following:

The proposed new borrowing authority framework would provide the Government with flexibility to meet unforeseen needs and standing authority to refinance outstanding market debt, subject to an annual approval by the Governor in Council.

So the cabinet....

So you have some flexibility. If you must quickly raise the authorized budget limit, for unforeseen reasons, you can do so through the Governor in Council, without Parliament's authorization. That's what it seems.

Is that true?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

That's very true. However, we're talking here about an emergency, an unforeseen economic shock that would require the government to increase its borrowing program. That's completely different from a situation where the limit is raised because the government wants to increase program spending or tax credits.

If there's an economic crisis like the one that occurred in 2007, which forced the government to increase its borrowing program, provisions in the legislation would provide this flexibility. However, to increase program spending, we would need to request, before Parliament, an adjustment in the authorized budget limit.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Okay, but let's get back to my hypothetical case. What will happen if Parliament refuses to raise the budget limit?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

In this case, it would reject most of the budget implemented. The budget limit is established based on the government's financial needs, which are specified in the budget.

Do you understand what I mean?

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

No, I'm not sure I understood what you just said.

Could you repeat it?

6:20 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

If the budget announced by the government includes, for the next five years, fiscal projections that make the established limit insufficient, the limit must be raised. If the limit can't be raised, it's as if the government can't get the established budget approved.

6:25 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

It would have the same impact as a budget defeated before Parliament. A vote on the budget limit would be considered a vote of confidence.

6:25 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

6:25 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

That's all for me, Mr. Chair.

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

You're okay?

All right, then Mr. Liepert.

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Ron Liepert Conservative Calgary Signal Hill, AB

I have a few brief questions that I need clarification on.

The number was $1.3 trillion?

6:25 p.m.

Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Nicolas Moreau

The exact number is $1.1—

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Ron Liepert Conservative Calgary Signal Hill, AB

Yes, rough numbers.

What's the current debt?