That's right, but I'm saying in a situation like that, focusing on the big-picture stuff, focusing on the major projects is going to miss what's going on.
You can take a look at the sorts of things that have happened to a lot of species in the Great Lakes. For instance, Atlantic salmon used to be native to Lake Ontario. It's an interesting question: what actually happened to Atlantic salmon? One of the things that's become very clear, looking at the retrospective progress of their demise, is that there wasn't any one thing; there were a bunch of little things. It was the construction of one dam after another dam after another dam, and one pond being dynamited in a river. All of these things added up to a critical mass of changes to the system that was lethal.
From our perspective, as an industry, we look at walleye production in southern Lake Huron and Lake Erie. It's the sum total of production from a bunch of different places, some of them fairly small, some of them quite significant.
My concern is what you could get into. To be honest with you, I don't know enough about where this is going to land. Certainly, the Fisheries Act is something that could stand some fixing. I'm not going to ever suggest otherwise. But when you start messing with the habitat regulations, that's my concern. Fish that aren't produced in large batches in one place, that are dispersed across a lot of watersheds and a lot of little reefs for their production, risk falling through the cracks of a program that's focused on just the big stuff. That's my real concern.