I think that everybody agrees that the Greenland fishery is an intercepting fishery. All the fish that Greenlanders catch are products of other countries. Yet, it is very difficult to deny them a fishery of some subsistence nature. The key is to try to keep the level of that subsistence fishery at, say, 20 or 30 tonnes, where it has sort of been agreed upon at NAFO, and where it has now bloomed to what we think is 50 or 60 tonnes.
The difficulty in negotiating with Greenland—and it's a diplomatic process, not one that we can pursue in a military or any aggressive way—is that our own consumption of wild Atlantic salmon is significant, such as our Labrador fishery, our Quebec fishery, and our overfishing in the Maritimes in the past. Greenland is very quick to point to Canada and its continuing consumption of wild salmon as a foil in our negotiations to reduce their quotas. It's something that we all have to continue to work at. Maybe some day there will be sanctions involved. Maybe there will be a trade like shrimp for salmon or some more substantive diplomatic process that will bring about answers and solutions.