All right.
The way I put my head around this notion of third party habitat banking is that you have a project. You will go through the avoidance and mitigation, but you see some net detriment. You will go out then and look for somebody who has done something good, and you basically buy those credits from them.
I would presume, if we're looking at the regulations, that the regulations should more or less say that whatever you buy should be equivalent to or even a little better than what you have lost.
That then suggests that if somebody has proactively gone out and has worked on some sort of restoration or whatever, it would take some time to find out exactly how effective that has been.
What kind of lead time would somebody who wants to be in the business of third party habitat banking have to be working with? How would they know, for instance, that a company the size of yours was planning something that they would maybe get to work on to get your business?
This is right down into the cogs and wheels of this thing. I'm interested in seeing how that would work.