It's probably a big challenge for the federal government to address the Constitution through the MPA process. It's an interesting suggestion, though.
You talked about terminal fisheries, with the weir and the gear types. Again, that's a fundamental change between how you see Canada operating its fishery and what you're recommending. That's another huge problem. Do you have a recommendation? The committee often asks for definitions of protection. Are you talking about no-take zones? Are we talking about improving the management within the ocean to protect either our fishery or nature? These are two slightly different values or goals.
Do you have a suggestion about gear types and management versus no-take protection areas for biodiversity and nature?