Thank you very much.
I agree with Mr. McCauley's proposals because they simplify the motion.
I get the sense that Mr. Johns would also like us to invite someone from National Defence. Would he like to propose a subamendment?
When my colleagues have the chance, I would like them to consult our committee website, where states its mandate. It clearly states: “The Committee is mandated to examine and conduct studies related to the following organizations”, and the Office of the Governor General's Secretary is on that list. So we can ask questions about this. It is part of our mandate.
It is a lot of money, we can all agree on that. If you feel we need a subamendment to speak with National Defence officials, I see no problem with that.
Nonetheless, someone agreed to breakfasts and lunches that cost $350 per person. That is a huge amount. I cannot afford that. I do not know if anyone here can afford that. We are not even talking about alcohol. Someone decided this would be a good idea and decided to go ahead with it because it would be fun.
We have to wonder. I understand the Governor General's role and I know she represents the Queen. Will we accept this for a long time? Will we allow our money to be spent that way?
If you would like to welcome someone from National Defence in connection with the decision by the Office of the Governor General's Secretary, I do not see a problem with that. I completely agree with what Mr. McCauley proposed. I always work towards consensus and will continue to do so.
It is unbelievable, $80,000, and that does not even include the other expenses. I do not know if I am the only one, but to my mind that is simply too much.