Evidence of meeting #70 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was etchemins.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Audrey O'Brien  Clerk of the House of Commons, House of Commons
Stéphan Aubé  Chief Information Officer, House of Commons

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

Indeed.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

So going to 12% would represent a variance of nearly 6.5%, based on what I calculated.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

It would.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

So that would be quite all right. Furthermore, you have the support of the people in the community as well as that of your colleagues. I do not believe Mr. Paradis will be coming to testify before the committee.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

No, but Mr. Paradis agrees with my proposal.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

He approves of it?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

Do you want him to send you a letter on the subject?

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Yes, perhaps. I would just like to be certain.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

Yes.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Because one of the things that we consider and that is very important for the committee is to ensure that the proposed changes have been approved by all those involved.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

Mr. Gourde, who is here, will be able to confirm it orally, but I will get Mr. Paradis to write a brief letter to the committee to confirm what I have just said.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

That would be perfect.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Maxime Bernier Conservative Beauce, QC

All right.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

I really have very few questions to ask my colleagues from Les Etchemins. Here we have the figures showing us that you have a very reasonable quota variance. I think you made an excellent presentation explaining why Bellechasse and Les Etchemins have a community of interest and that those communities are really merged together.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Steven Blaney Conservative Lévis—Bellechasse, QC

They are together.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Once again, with the support of all the members and all the people concerned, I think this is very clear. In fact, I do not really have any supplementary questions to ask you.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

My question is for my colleague François Lapointe.

I would like to know something about the name change. A name change was indeed provided for in the first proposal, but did the commission go back on that?

12:30 p.m.

NDP

François Lapointe NDP Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

It changed the suggestion, but it is still a new suggestion.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

So it is a new suggestion related to the new boundaries, as it were.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

François Lapointe NDP Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Yes and no.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

What do you mean by yes and no?

12:30 p.m.

NDP

François Lapointe NDP Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

I am going to refer to the sequence of events, if that is fine with you.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

No, my question—

12:30 p.m.

NDP

François Lapointe NDP Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

I will be brief.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

All right.