Evidence of meeting #126 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was agreed.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Stephanie Kusie  Calgary Midnapore, CPC
Jean-François Morin  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Trevor Knight  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Robert Sampson  Legal Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk

4:20 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

I will ask my dear colleague Trevor Knight who is an expert in political financing at Elections Canada to complement my answer. I would only add that the definition of candidate at the beginning of the Canada Elections Act says that a candidate is a candidate until all the financial obligations that are required under the act have been complied with.

My understanding is that at the end of this process when all financial returns have been provided and all debts have been reimbursed, the bank account should be closed and when a new campaign opens, then the new candidate should open a new bank account.

4:20 p.m.

Trevor Knight Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada

Yes, and the only thing I would add would be that as a candidate, once you start accepting contributions or incurring expenses for your election, even if it's before the writ period, the bank account has to be opened because all those contributions and expenses have to go through that bank account. Also, in closing, once all the transactions of the campaign are done and the surplus is disbursed, that's when the campaign bank account is closed.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Is there further discussion?

Do any of the witnesses have any comments on this amendment?

4:20 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

May we have a recorded vote?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We will have a recorded vote on CPC-111.

(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 3 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

As the amendment is defeated, it also defeats CPC-115. Amendment CPC-153 cannot be moved now because it was dependent on amendment CPC-111.

(Clause 233 agreed to on division)

(On clause 234)

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

There are a few amendments to clause 234.

We will first go to CPC-112.

4:20 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

This one doesn't strike me as familiar, in our having discussed it previously here, but it requires third parties to do pre-election reporting when there is a pre-election period, but the election is not on a fixed date

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

It was. We discussed it on CPC-94. It's a similar basis for the discussion.

4:25 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

Can you recall what the general conclusion was, David, in regard to the necessity or lack thereof for this? I'm sorry to put that burden on you.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

No, but I can tell you that we voted it down.

4:25 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

I'm sure that happened, but I'm trying to remember why.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I don't remember exactly, but I remember that it created weird circumstances that we weren't comfortable with.

That's the short version.

4:25 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

This one is clearly better.

This doesn't create weird circumstances. This resolves weird circumstances.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

If there is no further debate, we'll vote on CPC-112.

Did you want it on division?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

We don't say on division if it's defeated, right?

4:25 p.m.

A voice

Two voted against it.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

It was defeated on division.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Yes.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

That's the wrong side of the dividing line.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Right.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

We'll move to CPC-113.

4:25 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

As best I know, we did discuss this in detail yesterday, adding the geographical catchment area to opinion poll disclosures.

The government was not in favour of it, so I'm not sure what I could say today to persuade them otherwise. I feel as though we've had this conversation. Although Dancing with the Stars is not on tonight, I don't want to be here for an extended period of time as a result of discussing the—

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

I'm so out of touch with Dancing with the Stars. Is it getting close to the end of it, or is it just the beginning?

4:25 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

They're about a third to half way through.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

I actually prefer that part. It's funnier.