Evidence of meeting #45 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was champion.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Dara Lithwick  Committee Researcher

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

We can put something—

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Table 5 is on financial procedures. There's only one item here: ensure consistency between the estimates and the public accounts.

Mr. Davies.

On table 6 with respect to members, there are three topics.

Topic 1 is bribery (process).

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

There's a process to...?

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Arnold Chan Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

So much for honourable members.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

That came from my speech too, because there's a standing order that said that bribery is a crime, but there's no process to deal with it. I thought, why do we have this if there's no process? I want to understand that.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

The explanation says to develop a process for the House to deal with a charge of bribery levelled against a member.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

The standing order is also possible.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Are you championing that?

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I'll leave it alone.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We're letting that one go. There's no champion.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Yes, I'll let it go.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

It's a criminal matter.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I know, but that's the point. Why is it in the Standing Orders if it's a criminal matter?

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Order. We've passed that. It's gone. It's dropped.

Topic 2 is rising to be recognized: allow party leadership to speak from any seat in the Chamber belonging to their party.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

How do you define “leadership”?

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

That's from my speech. I said anybody from the House leadership teams.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

So would that be House leaders, whips, party leaders?

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

House leaders, whips, deputy House leaders, deputy whips, because they're often moving around in the chamber, all parties. It's to allow them to speak from any spot. It's too complicated to have everybody do that, but if they're at the other end of the room and they need to speak, they need to be able to get up to speak. That would apply for every party.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Arnold Chan Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Are you talking to the House teams?

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

The House teams, the House leaders, and deputy leaders.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Arnold Chan Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

The designated officers of the House.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

The House officers, yes.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Arnold Chan Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

If you want to champion it, then champion it.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Yes, I'll champion it.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Jamie Schmale Conservative Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock, ON

What would be so important that they have to rise to speak?