In addressing this specifically—the historical context—I think it's important to acknowledge everything that's been expressed by the witnesses so far and to summarize what we brought as our perspectives and that we've been heard. I think that's important. I don't envy the committee's putting that into a report, because it is such a challenging topic.
However, focusing on moving forward is the key. How do we prevent these types of situations from happening? How do we improve the understanding of historical context among parliamentarians and staff, and leverage all the resources in that area available to Parliament at a moment's notice, should they wish to understand a future complex issue similar to this one?