Thank you.
When I asked the first question, I was getting to my second one to bring it to the topic, once again, that we're talking about here, which is the incident in the gallery. My point, and what you laid out well, is about the evolving nature of physical threats and cybersecurity, and the protection of the precinct and the work you do.
I think the issue, from what we heard from a lot of witnesses over the course of this study, is that for guest lists and vetting, you would have access to, or get for security purposes...to see if somebody has a history of being a physical threat to the precinct and what's going on.
The challenge we had with the individual we are speaking about and this incident, when things were recognized, was there wasn't further vetting. We had a witness earlier this week who said, “I wish we had done a simple Google search. Maybe this wouldn't have happened, to a certain extent.”
My question to this point is about your capacity and ability to deal with that. I think we've narrowed it down, and PPS does not do an online search of individuals for an issue such as the one that happened here. It's more about a physical nature and the physical threat that members of the precinct have to deal with.
I'll ask you to speak about the capacity. You do not have the capacity, I believe, within existing resources to go and do that extra layer, but please talk about it again and confirm that, and whether you would be the ones best suited to handle that.