Evidence of meeting #37 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was reporter.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Order.

I will go to Mr. Siksay for the appropriate motion.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

On this issue of the release of the confidential draft report of the standing committee regarding security certificates and the conditions of detention in Kingston, I'd like to move that we report to the House the breach of the privileges of members that has resulted from the release of this draft report; that we indicate that media reports last week included direct quotations from the draft report and that other reporters have indicated they have copies of the confidential draft report; and that we ask the House to investigate further and refer it to the procedure and House affairs committee for further investigation and action.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

You have all heard Mr. Siksay's motion. Is there any discussion?

Mr. Telegdi.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Mr. Chair, I very strongly support the motion.

Let me just say that we are all partisan members, obviously, and that's okay, but I really like operating in such a way that when we come into committee, as much as possible we leave partisanship at the door and try to do what's best for the country when these kinds of situations arise.

God knows how the leak happened. It might have been advertent; it might have been inadvertent. I don't know. But it really undermines our capacity to work together, recognizing that we have all these tensions going between the parties. It undermines our ability to do that and to function effectively. I'm amazed at the quality of the quotes in there.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

To speak to Mr. Siksay's motion, the clerk informs me that the committee has the power to call an individual, a reporter, before our committee and to ask him directly where he received that report. The individual who spoke to me told me he's had a full copy of the report since Friday.

Would it be appropriate, from the committee's point of view, to bring that individual—or individuals, whoever they may be, who we know have copies of that report—before the committee to answer directly as to where they received that report?

Mr. Siksay.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

Mr. Chair, I wouldn't support that. I think reporters have a right to protect the sources they have. I don't want to get into questioning reporters about their sources.

I think the issue is that our privileges have been violated by someone either on this committee or associated with this committee who released the draft report, and that the motion goes to asking Parliament to solve that issue that's related to a member's conduct—or staff conduct, if that's where it came from. I don't have an issue with the reporters for dealing with something that landed in their laps, frankly. It shouldn't have happened, but I don't fault them for one second for running with what they had in front of them.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Well, I would imagine the procedure and House affairs committee would question reporters anyway as to where they received the report.

I'm very anxious to get to the bottom of this, because it throws a cloud over every single individual member of the committee—

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Except you, Mr. Chair. You weren't here. You were safely away.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

He had a copy.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

It happened the week before that.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

That's right.

Anyway, in terms of the reporter, you're talking about freedom of the press and what value we as a society place on it, and as disturbing as it is to have somebody leak a report, it's a lot more disturbing to undermine one of the pillars. It's a classic case where “I disagree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.” Really, that's the category the media fall into.

So I wouldn't support it either.

I think we just report it to the House committee on procedural affairs and see what they will do with it and hope strongly that it doesn't happen again. Let's get some kind of deterrent going, because we have to put this behind us.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Okay. Is there any further discussion on Mr. Siksay's motion?

(Motion agreed to)

It is carried unanimously that we proceed in that fashion. I will tell the clerk to make that submission.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

And could we also make sure that all copies get “confidential” stamped on them, even if they're done in French?

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Yes, sure.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Mr. Chair, I have a further point to that.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

The motion is dealt with, but we are being fairly flexible here.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

While that motion has been dealt with, I will propose another motion to be dealt with.

That motion would be to ask each member of the committee who was here whether they released the report directly to the specific reporter in question or not, and that that question be posed, and that the reporter be brought before this committee to answer the circumstances under which he got it, if he is prepared to do so. If he's not, that's fair, but I think that those two could give us the answer.

So I move that we pose the question to every member who was here as to whether they released the report to the press. I'll leave that motion at that point and deal with the reporter subsequently.

So that's the first motion.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

You have heard the motion.

Could you write that motion out?

February 20th, 2007 / 11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Mr. Chair, there were other members who are not here today.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

It doesn't have to be done today.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Does everyone understand the motion? I think you do. So we'll go to a discussion on the motion.

Mr. Wilson.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Blair Wilson Liberal West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I think there are two issues within that motion that have a difficulty coming together, at least in my mind. One of them is the questioning of MPs and whether or not anyone here at the table has leaked information. I have no problem with that part of the equation at all. It's the second part I have difficulty with, with respect to bringing the reporter in front of the committee and questioning--

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

That is going to be a separate motion, Mr. Wilson.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Blair Wilson Liberal West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC

So he's proposing two motions, one to question members of Parliament, and, two, whether or not he's going to bring forward the reporter.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Yes.

Let's deal with that first part of the motion.

Mr. Karygiannis.