There was a complaint—although it didn't go through to a hearing because the justice of the peace fully retired, and if they leave office we lose jurisdiction—that did come forward to the start of a public hearing and it was an allegation of incompetence as a result of a pattern of incompetence over a period of time: not knowing the law and misapplying the law. Yes, we have seen that, but it didn't go through all the way.
In a hearing that was fairly recent—a disposition is pending on it right now—the judicial officer made a decision to issue an information for a criminal charge and a decision to sign off on a subpoena, and the hearing panel found that, although those were judicial decisions, the surrounding circumstances were a cause for concern and shifted it into the realm of judicial misconduct. There is case law that says just because it's decision-making doesn't mean it's excluded from misconduct.