Evidence of meeting #73 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was border.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jacques Cloutier  Acting Vice-President, Operations, Canada Border Services Agency
Michael MacDonald  Director General, Operations Sector, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Niall Cronin  Director, North America Advocacy, Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Lise Bourgon  Director General, Operations, Strategic Joint Staff, Department of National Defence

9:20 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Thank you. Sorry, but I'm going to interrupt—

9:20 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

Can I just finish my answer?

9:20 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

No, I'm actually going to interrupt, because I understand the UNHCR argument—

9:20 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

But I'm answering your question.

9:20 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

—and the minister has actually advanced that argument in a lot of places. I have limited time.

9:20 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

It's not an argument. It's a fact.

9:20 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

I have limited time, so I'm going to say this.

We also have 300 cases that have come through, and more than 50% of those applications have been approved. So it's not one case. It's more than one case. I'm going to leave that.

I do want to actually talk about the IRB and the importance of ensuring that the integrity of our system is protected. When the minister was last here, there was a backlog with the IRB, and with an additional 1,000 cases being added to the backlog—and that's 1,000 cases per month—we now have a situation in which it is 1,400 per month, and there have been no additional resources given to the IRB. The minister himself, when he was last here, said that efficiencies needed to be looked at, which is what the IRB is doing, but he also said that there needed to be additional resources, yet no additional resources have been given to the IRB.

Is the minister planning on giving the IRB additional resources to deal with this influx?

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

You've asked a number of questions there. I'll try to answer as quickly as possible to take advantage of the time.

Number one, the IRB is an independent arm's-length adjudicatory body that makes its own decisions. However, we work closely with it to become as efficient as possible and so on.

On the issue of resources, we've launched a third-party review to make sure we can identify the best ways to invest in the IRB. It's not just a question of money. It's also a question of reforms. It's a question of doing things better and faster and more efficiently, and also with more innovation in the IRB processes. It takes a study to do that, and there's a third-party review going on now to identify those very challenges and solutions that you talk about.

9:25 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Thank you.

Is the minister looking at changing the structure of the IRB and how asylum claims are being processed?

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

The IRB third-party review will look at everything with respect to the IRB, and it will issue a report. That report will inform both you and me on the way forward for the IRB.

9:25 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Thank you.

The minister talked about how he felt that everything is being managed well. This is not about the staff on the ground. I have to say, and what I'm getting back from CBSA staff and, in fact, at every level, is that all of the staff are doing an exemplary job, along with the community, in a very trying situation.

However, it is interesting to note, in response to the committee member's question, that the IRCC indicates that it began tracking irregular crossings only in early April 2017. As a result, claims made by those who entered since the start of 2017 cannot be reported on. So there's a gap.

If the government had been monitoring the situation right from the get-go, anticipating what the implications of the Trump administration would be.... There is a huge gap, right? The irregular crossings began prior to April 2017, so why didn't the government get on with it right from the beginning? And what about Manitoba? Resources are being provided to Quebec, which is fantastic, but what about Manitoba? I know that the Province of Manitoba has asked for additional resources, specifically related to resettlement services. B.C. is also faced with tremendous stresses from the NGOs. They have spoken to the minister directly about those, and the minister has ignored that request and nothing has happened with respect to that.

So how can the minister say that you've managed this effectively?

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

I'll let my official, Mike MacDonald, answer the first question with respect to the tracking of the asylum seekers.

9:25 a.m.

Michael MacDonald Director General, Operations Sector, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Thank you, Chair.

In terms of whether or not there is a gap, there is not a gap. First, it's important to say that how an asylum seeker comes to Canada, from an IRCC perspective in terms of looking at their claim, is not important.

Now, there is no gap prior to April 2017 back to January, because we, as a federal government, can rely on the intercept data from the RCMP. Since April 1 we have combined all of our datasets in order to create a better picture overall, one that is consistent, and one that we can all work from. We have combined various data sources since April 1 to create that national picture, but we have access to all the data for the year.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Thank you very much.

I'm afraid that's seven and a half minutes.

9:25 a.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

That's not the information that has been provided.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Mr. Dubourg, you have the floor for seven minutes.

October 5th, 2017 / 9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

First of all, greetings to my colleagues Mr. Goodale and Mr. Hussen. I also welcome the other representatives with them.

My first questions are for Mr. Hussen.

As you said in earlier, it is important on the one hand to protect Canadians, but we must also take appropriate measures to protect people who look to Canada for protection.

This summer, there was an influx of migrants into Quebec. Some people said the federal government was in crisis. According to your figures on asylum seekers, is this a crisis or simply an unusual situation that the government can easily deal with?

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

There is no doubt in my mind that the numbers we were looking at in the summer were unusual in terms of the volume of daily arrivals. We went from a daily average of between 20 and 30, and then it became 50, and then we went as high as 200 to 300 a day.

The important thing to note here is that there was planning. The satellite office of the RCMP at Lacolle, which I was able to visit, had been procured before the increase in the influx. CBSA was able to quickly expand its operations and redeploy staff.

I was able to see first-hand the professionalism and the humane way in which people were being processed. There was absolutely no downgrading of our rigorous screening processes to make sure that each and every asylum seeker who was being processed in that facility was handled in a professional manner.

In terms of IRCC, we quickly ramped up our capacity in Montreal from being able to have about 32 eligibility hearings a day to about 200 a day, as a result of procuring more space and redeploying staff from other parts of Quebec and other parts of Canada, because we recognized that this was a pressure point, and we dealt with it accordingly.

My impression of the whole situation is that it was an unusual influx. It was an increase that was not similar to the previous volumes, but the fact that we were able to work very closely with Quebec and Ontario afterwards ensured that we were able to address any pressure points and increase the capacity within our own department and other departments to ensure that we responded to the situation in a professional manner. It was not a crisis.

9:30 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

Thank you. As you just said, it is an unusual situation. The media showed people arriving at our borders. At one point, there were 300 people or more arriving every day. That figure has now dropped to about 50 people.

I know that officials have taken various measures. You mentioned the measures taken here, in Canada, with community leaders. You yourself met with people in Montreal, and there were also trips to other countries. Your visit to the United States did not receive the same media coverage as the visits by your two colleagues.

When you visited New York City, who exactly did you meet? Did Global Affairs Canada play a role in that visit?

9:30 a.m.

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON

Yes, Global Affairs Canada facilitated the meeting. We actually held it at the Canadian consulate in New York. It involved the largest legal services provider for immigrants all across New York State, and the Catholic Charities Community Services, which is the largest settlement provider. Between the two of them, they actually take phone calls from individuals all over the state of New York who were asking questions about U.S. immigration policies as well as Canadian asylum policies. They field those calls and answer questions.

What struck me was that they needed to be brought up to speed on some of the issues around Canadian asylum policies. For example, they thought that having temporary protected status in the United States somehow meant that you had some sort of access to the Canadian asylum system. I corrected that. I was able to answer a lot of their questions. They didn't know that Canada actually removes people. I had to educate them on that. I told them that we remove people and I explained how that's done. I walked them through our asylum process and made sure they understood what was at stake.

They were very happy, because they said that now that they had that information they could share it with the people who call them. The consulate then promised to give them materials on our larger immigration system, because they felt that some of the people who call them could easily qualify under our legitimate economic immigration streams, and there was no use for them to essentially abuse the asylum system. They were very happy to receive that information from us.

9:35 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

Thank you, Mr. Hussen.

Time is passing very quickly and I would like to ask Mr. Goodale a question.

We have have heard proposals from people who want us to create official entry points, whether in Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle or in Emerson. In your opinion, would that be advisable given that the border is more than 9,000 kilometres long? Would we go so far as to build a border wall to prevent people from entering irregularly? What are your thoughts on that, bearing Canadian values in mind?

9:35 a.m.

Liberal

Ralph Goodale Liberal Regina—Wascana, SK

Obviously, Mr. Dubourg, Canadians would not support the notion of building a wall. That is not consistent with the traditions, the values, or the heritage of Canadians.

9:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

I'm afraid I need to cut you off there, at seven and a half minutes.

9:35 a.m.

Liberal

Ralph Goodale Liberal Regina—Wascana, SK

There is much more.

9:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

There is much more. Let's hope that next time you get around to it.

Mr. Motz, welcome to the committee. You have five minutes.