Evidence of meeting #4 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was applications.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Leif-Erik Aune
Raj Sharma  Managing Partner, Stewart Sharma Harsanyi, As an Individual
Lorne Waldman  Lawyer, Waldman & Associates, As an Individual
Guillaume Cliche-Rivard  President, Association québécoise des avocats et avocates en droit de l’immigration
Stéphanie Valois  Administrator, Association québécoise des avocats et avocates en droit de l’immigration

1:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

I call to order meeting number four of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration.

Welcome, everyone. Good afternoon to some of you, and good morning to those of you who are joining us from the west coast.

First, I would like to read a health and safety notice, a reminder to all attendees in the room to physically distance themselves from others by at least two metres and to wear a mask unless you are seated and you are more than two metres from anyone else.

This is a hybrid meeting. Some members are appearing in person in the parliamentary precinct and the other members are appearing remotely. I remind all members to please speak at a pace slow enough for interpretation to keep up. The clerk will be tracking raised hands and keeping a list for the chair. All questions should be decided by a recorded vote except for those decided unanimously or on division. This is based on the order adopted by the House on September 23. The meeting is being webcast and is available on ParlVU.

Before we go into the scheduling issues for today, I would like to read a clarification in regard to in camera meetings of the subcommittee:

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify certain elements related to in camera proceedings. Members of the Committee asked if meetings of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure are held in public by virtue of the motion the main Committee adopted regarding in camera proceedings.

For the benefit of members of the Committee the motion reads as follows: “That any motion to go in camera be debatable and amendable; and that the committee may only meet in camera for the following purposes: to consider a draft report; to attend briefings concerning national security; to consider lists of witnesses; and for any other reason with the unanimous consent of the committee; and, that all votes taken in camera with exception of votes regarding the consideration of draft reports be recorded in the Minutes of Proceedings including how each member voted when the recorded votes are requested.”

By agreeing to this motion, the main Committee has decided to govern its in camera proceeding in a particular manner. However, its application to a subcommittee remains another matter.

House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Third Edition, at page 974 states:

“Once established, subcommittees carry out their own work within the mandate entrusted to them. They are free to adopt rules to govern their activities, provided these are consistent with the framework established by the main committee.”

Subcommittees on agenda and procedure are established primarily to relieve the main committee of planning and administrative tasks.

I wish to draw the attention of committee members to page 1088 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Third Edition, which states that:

“Subcommittees on Agenda and Procedure usually meet in camera.”

Subcommittees meet to plan the work of the main committee in a more informal and collegial manner. Based on the motion establishing it, a subcommittee can conduct its business as it sees fit so it can exercise its mandate efficiently and report a work plan back to the main committee for consideration.

For these reasons there is a long set of precedent for holding subcommittee meetings in camera and, as such, the Chair can use her discretion in determining whether subcommittee meetings commence in camera or in public.

Thank you.

That is just a little clarification I wanted to provide.

Today we had to do some juggling of the schedule to accommodate the votes scheduled for 2 p.m. with bells starting at 1:30 p.m. I'm hoping for your understanding and flexibility. It was my judgment that we did not have time to proceed with the first panel before the vote, as there are witnesses with important testimony who deserve a full opportunity for uninterrupted questioning by the committee. We will schedule this panel, and I will return to that in a bit once we go into the details.

We will suspend this meeting at the bells and return after the vote for the originally scheduled second panel of witnesses, for one hour at approximately 3 p.m.

Going forward, the committee will be meeting from 3:30 to 5:30. A agreement was reached between the whips, and the CIMM committee meetings will be on Mondays and Wednesdays from 3:30 to 5:30 p.m. while the House is in session. This will be in effect as of Monday, November 16. The clerk circulated that to all committee members, but I wanted to bring it to everyone's attention.

Next week, the committee can meet from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. on Friday, November 13, if it wishes. I sent out an email to the members of the subcommittee asking them to let me know if that is the desire. Initially we were looking to see if the minister can could come to that. The minister is not available on November 13, so if we decide there will be a meeting on November 13, it would be to continue our study on the impact of COVID-19 on immigration. We could choose to invite today's first panel to come back next Friday, November 13, or we could invite them during a regular Monday or Wednesday meeting. It is the will of the committee to meet next week, so I would like to have members' input on whether the majority of you, or all of you, agree to hold the meeting on November 13 to listen to witnesses.

I see a hand raised. Mr. Dhaliwal.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey—Newton, BC

Madam Chair, I think it's a good idea because there will probably be votes in the coming weeks as well, because [Inaudible--Editor] scheduled now from 3:30 to 5:30, so it's a good idea to have a meeting next Friday.

When we were travelling on special meetings like this, in previous Parliaments, even when we were sitting in the House, we had an agreement at the international trade committee that particular meetings that were brought forward.... There were no motions being brought forward, as long as it was a productive meeting. I'm all for bringing in the witnesses only.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

I see Mr. Allison has raised his hand.

Mr. Allison.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dean Allison Conservative Niagara West, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I'm never in favour of meeting during a break week, but I certainly would have made the exception if the minister was able to meet. Friday, especially, is the worst time we can meet. It was the only time we were given this week, so we took what we could get. Going forward, as we move to Mondays and Wednesdays—that makes some sense—if we need to put in an extra meeting or go a little bit longer, I don't have a problem with that. Today may be a bit of a challenge because I know people have schedules, but I will defer to the committee. I think it's kind of tough. I also think it'd be nice to have the two panels together. Another day needs to happen anyway, so my thought is to try to keep those together.

Once again, if theminister were going to be here next week, I would certainly make the commitment on a Friday, but Friday is a tough day, especially in a break week. No minister is here. I'm personally not all that enthusiastic about trying to meet in a break week on a Friday afternoon with no minister.

Thanks.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Ms. Dancho.

November 6th, 2020 / 1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Just to build on some of the comments by my colleague, I guess we're talking about two scheduling issues today. I know the extension of an hour conflicts with quite a few of our schedules, so I would appreciate it if we could have the fulsome panel we planned for today. I'm happy to meet on another, additional day or to tack on an extra couple of hours to another committee meeting, but it's quite disruptive today, particularly with the short notice. That's one thing.

Next week, I know that members of the committee were keen to meet with the minister, but since he's not available and it is a constituency week, there are a number of constituency things we have planned in our communities. It's one thing to cancel them for a minister who is difficult to get to the committee, but it's another to continue with the study when we have obligations in our constituencies. I would just ask that we consider not having that meeting on Friday unless the minister is able to attend.

Thank you.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Ms. Kwan.

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

I guess disruptions from votes are going to happen quite regularly. What I'm worried about is that we will keep on losing time with our scheduled committee days. We have a variety of work that we need to get on with, so I am inclined to proceed today, if that is at all possible, to make sure that we don't lose both panels. At least we'll get one panel in.

I do have constituency calls and Zoom meetings lined up, but if we proceed that way, I'm going to get my staff to reschedule those to accommodate the work of the committee.

With respect to Friday, it's not ideal. Like everyone else, I think constituency weeks are precious time, but again, I recognize the work we have in front of us as a committee. We have this study. There are many other studies that I certainly would wish to move on with. I will also accommodate the Friday if the committee's going to proceed.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

We'll hear from other people, and then we can come to a conclusion.

Mr. Serré, you are next.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Serré Liberal Nickel Belt, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I also have constituency appointments this afternoon. My preference, as Ms. Dancho mentioned earlier, would be to reschedule the two panels we had today for November 16. Because we don't have the minister next Friday, we do not need to have a meeting November 13. I agree with the two other comments made earlier.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Next on the list is Ms. Martinez Ferrada.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Soraya Martinez Ferrada Liberal Hochelaga, QC

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I know we will all be in our respective ridings during next week's parliamentary recess. I hope that just because we can't receive the minister doesn't mean we won't have a meeting on Friday. I think it's just as—if not more—important to hear from the witnesses than to hear from the minister.

If everyone wants a break next week, I have no problem supporting this request. That said, I would like us to be able to hear from the witnesses for at least one hour today. I believe that's what has been agreed to, but I would just like to make sure that everyone agrees that we will hear witnesses for one hour today and that those we haven't been able to hear from will be invited back, as soon as we know the dates of the next committee meetings.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Ms. Normandin, please go ahead.

1:15 p.m.

Bloc

Christine Normandin Bloc Saint-Jean, QC

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Since everyone has added their two cents, I will too.

Personally, I've already made arrangements to be available both today and next Friday, should we decide to hold a meeting. I understand everyone's grievances, but I'm also concerned that we may not be able to make sufficient progress not just in this study but the upcoming ones as well. I'm thinking in particular of the workers' file, which will become more and more relevant as the crisis evolves.

I will make myself available, but I will bend to the will of the committee.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Does anyone else want to proceed further? Okay.

I would like to go by the support of the majority of members. I think we have rescheduled the second panel for today, from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m., and we have the room available. The clerk has arranged that. The witnesses have been notified that the change is happening because of the vote. Hearing from the members, I think I would like that we proceed with the second panel. I would request that members make some arrangements today. I know that Fridays are meant for our constituencies, but what we have to do is also important. We can proceed with the second panel.

Hearing members about November 13, I think we can leave it. We won't schedule the meeting, based on the members' will that they don't want to have any conflicts with the work they have in the constituency.

Is it okay with everyone if we go ahead with today's second panel, reschedule the first panel—I will discuss with the clerk to see when we can invite the panel on the colleges and universities—proceed today after the votes, and not have a meeting on November 13?

Is it the will of the committee?

I see some heads nodding.

1:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Okay.

Mr. Clerk, we will go ahead with the second panel. We will meet at around 3 p.m. I hope the votes will be done by that time. We will meet for the second panel, we will then not have a meeting on November 13, and then we will reschedule our calendar.

I understand that the minister is available to appear November 25 for one hour, followed by one hour with the officials.

Can I have a motion to invite the minister and the officials to appear [Technical difficulty—Editor]

1:15 p.m.

A voice

So moved.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

I'm sorry, Madam Chair. Maybe it's just me, but I couldn't hear a thing you were saying.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey—Newton, BC

It's the same here, MP Kwan.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Geoff Regan Liberal Halifax West, NS

It's strange, but I can hear.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

I will repeat what I said.

I understand that the minister is available to appear before the committee on November 25 for one hour, followed by one hour with the officials.

Can I have a motion to invite the minister and officials to appear on the main estimates and the supplementary estimates?

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey—Newton, BC

Madam Chair, I will bring forward the motion to bring the minister and the officials on November 25 for two hours.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Salma Zahid

Mr. Dhaliwal has moved that we invite the minister on November 25 for one hour, followed by the officials in the second hour.

Is that the will of the committee? Do I have unanimous support on that?

(Motion agreed to)

We will invite the minister to appear before the committee on November 25.

For the information of members, the minister is also available to appear before the committee on December 2 for one hour, on the motion of Ms. Kwan, and we will schedule that meeting.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Madam Chair, can I have some clarification?