I'll take a closer look at that after we get through the meeting and work on my thinking around that, but I just want to ask the question, does having the word “arrangement” versus the word “agreement” in clause 60 as it stands right now lend more flexibility, in your view, to at least doing the things that you would need to do under this act better than if it were confining you to specific agreements?
On June 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.