As I said, we will issue a notice saying we are redoing this, please comment, etc. This is the principle I just enunciated here: the ordinary user should not subsidize the heavy users. You know what we did. Does this make sense? Do you have a better mousetrap? Where do you think we erred, and what do you suggest? I'm sure TekSavvy, from your riding, will come forward and say for you that's fine, but the discount on 15% does not take into account the cost that is imposed. If you do oppose a regime like that, the discount has to be at least 40%, or something like that. Somebody will put that.
I will ask him, okay, you're telling me 40%. Explain to me the cost of this position, etc. I don't want to hurt you. On the other hand, I don't want you to have a free ride on Bell, so let's figure out what is the appropriate one. They will present evidence, studies, etc., and Bell will come and presumably say exactly the opposite. At the end of the day, we will try to determine, based on the evidence, based on our verification of the evidence, where the truth is and where we should come down.