Perhaps I'll start with the broader perspective, and then Stephen can talk about the business model specifically.
Here's something to keep in mind. The suggestion that recognizing the directors and screenwriters as authors or first owners of copyright wouldn't upend the market, I find troubling. These arrangements have been negotiated in collective agreements for years—decades—by very strong and effective unions like the one Maureen works for. All of the ownership and the assignments and the exclusive licences are covered by those collective agreements, including all of the royalty streams flowing back through to screenwriters, directors, actors, and everyone else.
I wanted to start from that sort of high-level perspective. Maybe Stephen can talk about how it would affect his business model.