Industry Committee on June 11th, 2020

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Good afternoon, everyone. I call this meeting to order.

Welcome to meeting number 23 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the committee on Monday, June 1, the committee is meeting to study the Investment Canada Act.

Today's proceedings are taking place by video conference and will be made available via the House of Commons website.

I'd like to remind members and witnesses to please wait until I recognize you by name before speaking. When you are ready to speak, please unmute your microphone, making sure you have selected the language that you will be speaking. Then when you are finished speaking, make sure you remute your mike. When you are speaking, please speak slowly and clearly, so that the translators can do their work.

As is my normal practice, I will wave a yellow card when there are 30 seconds remaining in the time period, and I will raise the red card when your time is up. Please respect the signs so that everyone can get a turn.

I'd now like to welcome our witnesses. We have two panels today.

Our first panel consists of Mr. Tim Hahlweg, assistant director, requirements, Canadian Security Intelligence Service; Mr. Mitch Davies, senior assistant deputy minister, industry sector, Department of Industry; and Dominic Rochon, senior assistant deputy minister, national security and cybersecurity branch, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.

In our second panel, which we will reintroduce after the first panel, we have Omar Wakil, partner, Torys LLP; and Michelle Travis, research director, Unite Here Canada.

Each witness group will have five minutes to present, followed by our regular question periods.

With that, we will start with Mr. Hahlweg. You have the floor for five minutes.

[Tim Hahlweg, Assistant Director, Requirements, Canadian Security Intelligence Service]

Madam Chair, members of the committee, good afternoon.

As indicated, my name is Tim Hahlweg. I'm the assistant director of requirements at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

Among other things, my directorate is responsible for the analysis of intelligence that CSIS collects on threats to the security of Canada. Our intelligence assessments and advice are provided to government to inform decision-making.

I want to thank you very much for the invitation to participate in the committee’s study of the Investment Canada Act.

I want to begin by briefly outlining CSIS's mandate, which is to investigate activities suspected of constituting a threat to the security of Canada, to advise the Government of Canada on such threats and to take measures to reduce these threats. Threats to the security of Canada are defined in section 2 of the CSIS Act as espionage or sabotage, an influenced activity, terrorism and subversion of government through violence.

As discussed in our recent public report, state-sponsored economic—

[Sébastien Lemire, Bloc, Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC]

A point of order, Madam Chair.

Interpretation isn't working.

[Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay, Bloc, Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC]

That's what I was going to say.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Okay, thank you.

Mr. Hahlweg, wait one moment. I'm going to pause your time.

Can someone find out what the problem is with interpretation?

I'm on the French channel, and I'm getting English translation.

I'm going to do a quick test.

Sébastien, can you confirm whether you are hearing me in French or in English?

[Sébastien Lemire, Bloc, Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC]

I can hear you in French.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Perfect.

We will start again. It looks as though we're back.

Mr. Hahlweg, go ahead.

[Tim Hahlweg]

Thank you.

As discussed in our recent public report, state-sponsored economic espionage activities in Canada continue to increase in breadth, depth and potential economic impact. In order to fulfill their national, economic, intelligence and military interests, some foreign states engage in espionage activities.

Foreign espionage has significant economic ramifications for Canada—

[Sébastien Lemire, Bloc, Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC]

Excuse me, Madam Chair, but did you hear what the French interpreter said? She said the witness is too far away from his microphone, which makes interpretation difficult. If the situation doesn't improve, she's going to stop interpreting.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Give me a moment, please.

Mr. Hahlweg, is it possible for you to slow down so that the translaters can keep up with you?

[Tim Hahlweg]

Absolutely.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Thank you. We'll try again.

[Tim Hahlweg]

Foreign espionage has significant economic ramifications for Canada, including job loss, intellectual property, corporate and tax revenues, and competitive advantages.

With our economic prosperity and our open academic research communities, Canada offers attractive prospects to foreign investors. Although foreign investment is a key driver of Canada's economic prosperity, it also has the potential in certain cases to adversely affect our national security interests. The acquisition of sensitive intellectual property, technology and vast amounts of Canadian citizens' private data for foreign use or with foreign-state control can threaten national security. While the vast majority of foreign investment in Canada is carried out in an open and transparent manner, some state-owned enterprises and private firms with suspected or known ties to their governments and/or intelligence services can pursue corporate acquisition bids in Canada or other economic activities on a non-commercial basis for their own strategic interests.

Foreign states have engaged in espionage and foreign interference, targeting Canada for years.

[Sébastien Lemire, Bloc, Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC]

Madam Chair, I have to raise another point of order. The interpreter is saying that the sound quality isn't good enough to provide accurate interpretation. That's a problem for our witness.

[Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay, Bloc, Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC]

However, the sound quality just improved a few seconds ago. Does that make interpretation possible now?

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Mr. Hahlweg, please wait one moment. I'm just going to verify with the translators whether they actually have a copy of your remarks to make sure that, if there's a problem with the sound, they're able to continue to translate.

[Sébastien Lemire, Bloc, Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC]

That's an excellent idea.

[Kathleen Ratel, Interpreter, Translation Bureau, Department of Public Works and Government Services]

Hello, Madam Chair. This is Kathleen here in Ottawa. I'm the interpreter coordinator.

I can check with my team to see if they have the speaking remarks. However, having the text is one thing. Interpreters still have to check against delivery. For that to be possible, they need clear sound.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Okay. Is it the sound that is difficult, or is it in terms of the speed?

[Kathleen Ratel]

It is both, actually. There was improvement with the sound when the witness placed the microphone higher up, but it seems that the device itself does not allow for clear sound. The last option we can try, perhaps, is for the witness to put the microphone further away and up to see if that works, but really, it's a matter of quality. It's not just a question of having the text.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Okay.

Mr. Hahlweg, could you move the microphone a little further away and try to speak a little more slowly? We're going to test that.

[Tim Hahlweg]

Absolutely.

Foreign states have engaged in espionage and foreign interference targeting Canada for years. This is not—

[Kathleen Ratel]

Sorry to interrupt, but could the witness take the earbud out of his left ear so as to place the microphone directly in front of his mouth?

Let's give this a try.

[Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay, Bloc, Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC]

Madam Chair, to avoid wasting time and our turns, I suggest we move on to another witness while Mr. Hahlweg's sound issues are being fixed.

[The Chair, Liberal, Sherry Romanado]

Yes, we can do that, but I want to make sure everyone can hear the testimony. We'll stop after the second witness to fix the problem. We're going to see if it's working. If not, we'll go to the next witness.

Can interpretation tell us if it worked properly? If not, we'll go to the next witness.