Thank you, Mr. Chair, I'm grateful for the opportunity.
In view of all the testimony that's already been given, I'll shorten my comments to what has not been covered by my previous colleagues.
Nigeria is very clearly a country in social crisis. The Nigerian human rights organization, the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, has estimated that between 2009 and 2023 at least 52,000 Christians have been killed, 18,500 have been abducted and are likely dead, and more than 20,000 churches and Christian schools have been attacked. Since 2023, this persecution has continued unabated.
Between January and August of this year, a further estimated 7,000 Christians have been massacred. Militias have burned homes and crops, pushed out people from their territory to seize land and forcibly imposed Islam in some of these regions.
However, this is not simply about land disputes and scarce resources. Sometimes when we sit in committees and subcommittees like this, we hear big numbers of people who are suffering grave human rights atrocities. I want to remind all of us here that each one of these persons was a unique, irreplaceable human being, members of families, with souls, so these are horrific numbers given in that light and with that perspective.
Muslims also face persecution, as you've already heard. For example, the various factions of the Boko Haram insurgency are dyed-in-the-wool jihadists waging what they view as a holy war. However, some of these jihadists have killed Muslim civilians alongside Christians. Indeed, Boko Haram's Islamist ideology makes virtually no distinction between the two.
Christians are being targeted in large part through mass killings by the Fulani militias. Again, the reasons why are complex. The persecution has been under way in central Nigeria since March 2010, but has increased exponentially and has spread to other parts of the country.
Communities are chosen for targeting by the jihadists. Overall, 2.7 Christians were killed for every Muslim killed in the data period of 2019-23, and I'm referencing a study by the Observatory for Religious Freedom in Africa, which was a groundbreaking study trying to understand the nature of the persecution.
However, again, Muslims are also terribly affected by the violence, but I think we need to note the issue of proportionality where Christians are typically more targeted.
What about the Nigerian authorities in all of this? As Nigeria expert James Barnett of the Hudson Institute has argued, Nigeria is experiencing multiple distinct yet overlapping conflicts. Some but not all of these conflicts are religious in nature. The complexity of the situation has highlighted the inability of Nigerian authorities to tackle the many significant socio-religious and socio-political challenges that besiege the country.
Indeed, the insufficient action by successive governments and alleged complicity by elements in the security forces have allowed religious persecution to spread like a cancer, with militias increasingly targeting ethnic Hausa Muslim communities in the northwest.
No matter where these attacks happen, the army is often absent or fails to head off the attacks through effective intelligence and mobilization. The militias are largely able to operate with impunity. The Nigerian government and its armed forces seem incapable of addressing the situation decisively. I want to emphasize that it's a clear case of religious freedom being egregiously violated, not due to government restrictions on religion but rather due to civil authorities' inability to address the social hostilities that manifest as religious persecution.
Why is this horrific situation being ignored?
Firstly, Africa is largely ignored by western democracies and by western media. This is an endemic challenge; it's not just with regard to Nigeria and this situation.
Secondly, there is the downplaying of the role of religion in conflicts such as this. Many secular western elites, including foreign policy actors, have equivocated on the nature of the violence, downplaying or misrepresenting it by failing to recognize the important religious element of these attacks. This attitude was also present when ISIS swept across Iraq and Syria in the mid-2010s. The vast majority of those in the foreign policy community have little to no understanding of religion and how it defines not only social relations but also politics, culture and even economic activity in most of the world. Therefore, they're not able to address these situations as they present.
I've argued before that diplomats need to “get religion” if they're going to be effective in many regions of the globe in addressing the challenges that are there.
What can be done?
Global Affairs Canada can work through the International Contact Group on Freedom of Religion or Belief to develop sustained multilateral policy and programming initiatives to tackle the persecution at its roots.
Global Affairs should reorient its approach to in-country programming by expanding its partnerships with reliable and experienced faith-based agencies that have the networks, sustained engagement and deep knowledge of a particular region. Examples could include Aid to the Church in Need, Christian Solidarity Worldwide or the Mennonite Central Committee.
Finally, Global Affairs Canada, through the Canadian Foreign Service Institute, should develop a mandatory program of training in religion and foreign relations for Canada-based and outbound diplomats, with targeted country-specific modules to better equip them with the knowledge required for engaging religious actors and issues. On the ground, we can do much, but we need to understand what is happening.
Thank you.