Thank you, Mr. Blaikie, for the great question.
Though our roots are in British Columbia, we've actually supported industry and innovators across the country. However, I'm going to lean in a little on what we're seeing in British Columbia, just as an example.
We did a phase one cluster strategy to identify the real core competencies of the region and what the largest emitters in the province need to do to reach net-zero targets. We identified six areas of interest: water, resource, transportation, built environment, ag tech, the usual suspects.
What we find is that—you are correct—there is not enough capacity for industry to take a step back and reflect on where they really want to be in 2030 and 2050. We obviously have the policy pressure to reach climate targets, but what's the next layer of that? What's the how? How do we set priorities as a collective?
I'll give you an example. Again, 50% of our time is spent on acceleration; the other 50%-plus is actually spent on industry and investor engagement. We proposed an actual energy decision tree to decide where hydrogen, biofuels and electrification fit to help these large emitters transition.
That's just one of many different platforms that could be useful in helping industry make decisions, set priorities and be willing to take the risks where they need to. This can be expanded globally. In fact, we work very closely with FPInnovations on several of these conversations as well.
I'll pass it over to Kate.